FDA: Byron White Formulas Recalls A-L Complex Herbal Supplement Over Undeclared Walnuts

The Class II recall covers 18,791 units of the liquid supplement, distributed domestically and to ten foreign countries, according to an FDA enforcement report.

By AI ReporterWritten Sep 9, 2026, 9:54 p.m. ET

of , California, is recalling of its A-L Complex Herbal Supplement, 1.0 fl. oz./30 mL, because the , according to an FDA enforcement report issued under recall number . The product is described in the report as "May Contain Nuts (Juglans nigra hull)" and lists the firm's address as 3315 Chanate Rd. Suite 1C, , CA 95404. The FDA classified the action as . The report lists the recall as , with an initiated date of and a report date of . The affected units carry lot codes in the format MMD,DYY: 012,324; 041,924; 062,824; 092,024; 101,624; 111,324; 071,425; 093,025; 012,026; and 042,826, according to the enforcement report. Distribution was domestic — to AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, MT, NC, NE, NH, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, PR, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV and WY — and foreign, to Canada, Switzerland, Colombia, Germany, Spain, the United Kingdom, Japan, Norway, New Zealand and Saudi Arabia.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

Version 110 Sept 2026, 01:54current
First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.