FDA Closes Recall of Clover Hill Dairy Smoked Cheddar Cheese
The agency considers the recall carried out for smoked cheddar cheese recalled due to Listeria monocytogenes contamination.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 19, 2026, 9:41 p.m. ET
This recall is open. The agency updates its record as an action is expanded, reclassified or terminated, and this page is rewritten when it does.
We last searched for new coverage of this at Aug 19, 2026, 8:44 p.m. ET — checked 2h ago.
Earlier reports
Aug 19, 2026, 9:41 p.m. ETFirst report
FDA Records Class I Recall of Clover Hill Dairy Smoked Cheddar Cheese
An ongoing Class I recall was published in an FDA enforcement report on August 12, 2026, concerning smoked cheddar cheese products from Clover Hill Dairy, LLC of Mechanicsville, Maryland. The recall action was initiated on June 1, 2026, due to contamination with Listeria monocytogenes, and the situation remains open and developing.
The recall covers Clover Hill Dairy LLP Smoked Cheddar Cheese Varieties (Cheddar, White Cheddar), sold in 1/2-lb and 1-lb units with identifying code AA051526 and instructions to keep refrigerated. Distribution was recorded in Maryland, Virginia, and New York. Total quantity distributed, packaging, and labeling details are listed as unknown in FDA enforcement report H-1216-2026. A Class I designation is the FDA's most serious category, applied when there is a reasonable probability that using the product will cause serious harm or death.
According to the FDA, Listeria monocytogenes causes listeriosis, which can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems, and can lead to miscarriage and stillbirth in pregnant women. Agency records show 17 other actions by Clover Hill Dairy, LLC, including August 12, 2026 recalls for mild cheese and Pepper Jack cheese varieties contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes. Agency databases show 569 food recalls citing Listeria monocytogenes over the past two years. Prior actions and broader hazard tallies do not constitute evidence of fault regarding this specific recall.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 01:41current
First published.
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 01:53current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.