FirstAlerts

CPSC Expands Recall of Monkey Mania Firework Toys Over Burn Hazard

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission warns that certain Monkey Mania firework toys can ignite clothing, with no incidents reported.

3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 21, 2026, 9:20 a.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 21, 2026, 8:51 a.m. ETWritten Aug 21, 2026, 9:52 a.m. ET
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission () has expanded its recall of Monkey Mania firework toys, according to a report by Medical Daily. The affected products are bright orange and blue plastic battery-powered bubble guns with a trigger switch, a bubble liquid canister, and a slot that accepts a cylindrical firework insert. The recalled items carry model numbers MM0799, MM079A, MM0799B, MM0799C, MM0799D, and MM0799E. The toys, , can produce high temperatures capable of traveling substantial distances and igniting fabrics, posing a burn hazard. The advises consumers to . have been reported, according to Medical Daily.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 21, 2026, 9:22 a.m. ET

    CPSC Reports Injuries Linked to Monkey Mania Firework Toys

    The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has received reports of injuries involving Monkey Mania firework toys, according to Medical Daily. The agency previously warned that these devices can produce high temperatures that travel far enough to set clothing on fire.

    The recalled products are bright orange and blue plastic battery-powered bubble guns with a trigger switch, a bubble liquid canister, and a slot that accepts a cylindrical firework insert. They were sold online and by various fireworks retailers nationwide under the brand Monkey Mania, distributed by Raccoon Fireworks. Identifying codes include MM0799, MM079A, MM0799B, MM0799C, MM0799D, and MM0799E.

    CPSC advises consumers to stop using the fireworks immediately and dispose of them, and specifically not to sell or give them away. The agency has not specified the number or nature of the reported injuries.

  2. Aug 21, 2026, 9:20 a.m. ETFirst report

    CPSC Warns of Burn Hazard in Monkey Mania Firework Toys

    The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has issued a warning about Monkey Mania firework toys, which can produce high temperatures capable of traveling substantial distances and igniting fabrics, according to a report from Medical Daily. The warning, reported on August 21, 2026, advises consumers to stop using the fireworks immediately and dispose of them, and specifically not to sell or give them away.

    The recalled products are bright orange and blue plastic battery-powered bubble guns with a trigger switch, a bubble liquid canister, and a slot that accepts a cylindrical firework insert. They were sold online and by various fireworks retailers nationwide. Identifying codes include MM0799, MM079A, MM0799B, MM0799C, MM0799D, and MM0799E. The firm is Raccoon Fireworks.

    No incidents or injuries have been reported, according to Medical Daily.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 121 Aug 2026, 13:52current

    First published.

  2. Version 121 Aug 2026, 13:20current

    First published.

  3. Version 121 Aug 2026, 13:22current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.