FirstAlerts
Recalls & Safety AlertsVersion 6

FDA Records Class I Recall of D'Dioses Nanche Ice Pops Over Undeclared Milk, Nuts and Dyes

An enforcement report lists 120 cases of the 81.7 g bar recalled across four states, with the action still ongoing.

By AI ReporterUpdated Aug 7, 2026, 10:22 a.m. ET
An FDA enforcement report, recall number , records an recall of "," made by The record gives the reason as: "" The recall was initiated on May 4, 2026, and the report is dated July 22, 2026. The quantity is listed as , distributed in New Jersey, Connecticut, New York and Pennsylvania. The status is listed as , and this is a developing enforcement action. is the FDA's most serious recall category, used where there is a reasonable probability that using the product will cause serious harm or death. On undeclared allergens, the FDA says an undeclared allergen is an ingredient the label does not name, and that people with an allergy or severe sensitivity to it run the risk of a serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they eat the product; anyone without that allergy is not affected. The product is a finished consumer grocery item, not a bulk ingredient: a single frozen bar of 81.7 g carrying a retail UPC and a per-bar weight, the packaging of something scanned at a till. Background reference sources describe it as a paleta — the Mexican style of ice pop, a frozen bar on a stick that in its water-based form is made essentially of fruit, water and sugar, frozen in a mould — of the kind bought individually or in small multipacks from paleterías, ice-cream carts and vendors, corner shops and grocery freezer cases. The flavour, nanche (nance), is described in the Plants For A Future database and the Slow Food Foundation's Ark of Taste as the small round orange-yellow fruit of *Byrsonima crassifolia*, a tropical American tree growing in southern Mexico, Central America, the Caribbean and northern South America, eaten fresh or worked into drinks, preserves, ice creams and frozen desserts — the role it plays here. The agency's database lists 15 other actions by this firm, including four other ice pop recalls also dated July 22, 2026, giving the same reason: D'Dioses Nuez, 1 Bar (81.7 g), UPC 827912008548; D'Dioses Tamarindo, 1 Bar (81.7 g), UPC 827912008593; D'Dioses Arroz con Leche, 4 oz (85 g), UPC 710594511843; and D'Dioses Fresa Leche, 4 oz (85 g), UPC 710594511850. That history is database context and says nothing about fault in this action. The same database records 745 food recalls citing an undeclared allergen over the past two years; other firms' recalls are not evidence about this one.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 67 Aug 2026, 14:22current

    Added the source URLs for the FDA enforcement record, the Class I definition, the allergen guidance and the product-background references; text otherwise unchanged.

  2. Version 57 Aug 2026, 12:57

    Product-background paragraph rewritten from new reference sources (paleta description via Wikipedia/Popik; nance via Plants For A Future and Slow Food), replacing the earlier Purdue/Agroforestry-based fruit detail.

  3. Version 47 Aug 2026, 07:49

    Replaced the product-background paragraph with the revised reference sourcing (Purdue NewCROP, World Agroforestry, Plants For A Future) and their fruit description; removed the paleta/paletería framing and earlier size and culinary details not in the current reference data.

  4. Version 37 Aug 2026, 03:28

    Replaced the unsourced Wikipedia/journal/NBC background on nanche and paletas with the supplied botanical reference sources (Purdue NewCROP, Slow Food, IPlantz, iNaturalist) and added the source URLs.

  5. Version 26 Aug 2026, 23:07

    Replaced the product-background paragraph with sourcing from Wikipedia, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, IPlantz and NBC News, adding the paleta/Tocumbo context and dropping unsupported size and origin details.

  6. Version 16 Aug 2026, 18:55

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.