FirstAlerts
Recalls & Safety AlertsVersion 6

FDA Records Class I Recall of D'Dioses Piña Colada Ice Pops Over Undeclared Milk and Nuts

An enforcement report lists 150 cases of the single-bar frozen pop recalled across four Northeastern states, with the action ongoing.

By AI ReporterUpdated Aug 7, 2026, 11:13 a.m. ET
An FDA enforcement report, recall number , records a recall of "," from The record gives the reason as: "" The quantity is listed as , with distribution recorded as "" The record lists the recall as initiated on May 4, 2026, with a report date of July 22, 2026, and its status as . is the FDA's most serious recall category, used where there is a reasonable probability that using the product will cause serious harm or death. On undeclared allergens, the FDA says an undeclared allergen is an ingredient the label does not name, and that people who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to it run the risk of a serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they eat the product; anyone without that allergy is not affected. The product is a finished consumer item rather than a bulk ingredient: a paleta, the Mexican style of frozen bar on a stick, sold here as a single 3.7 oz (81.7 g) unit with its own retail barcode. Background sources describe paletas as made either water-based (fruit, water and sugar) or milk- and cream-based, eaten straight from the wrapper as a frozen dessert; the "piña colada" name refers to the pineapple-juice-and-cream-of-coconut pairing of the cocktail. According to the FDA's product description, the range is produced in Paterson, New Jersey, and sold through retail grocery stores, so the people who handle it are ordinary shoppers rather than manufacturers. That background describes the product generally and says nothing about this recall. The agency's database records 15 other actions by this firm, including four also reported on July 22, 2026 and also classified , each citing the same reason: D'Dioses Nuez, 1 Bar (81.7 g), UPC 827912008548; D'Dioses Tamarindo, 1 Bar (81.7 g), UPC 827912008593; D'Dioses Arroz con Leche, 4 oz (85 g), UPC 710594511843; and D'Dioses Fresa Leche, 4 oz (85 g), UPC 710594511850. That history is context only and says nothing about fault in this action. The same database records 745 food recalls citing an undeclared allergen over the last two years; other firms' recalls are not evidence about this one.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 67 Aug 2026, 15:13current

    No new facts; headline and dek added, story text unchanged.

  2. Version 57 Aug 2026, 13:37

    Corrected the bar size to the 3.7 oz (81.7 g) figure in the record, removed unsourced paleta history and vendor detail, and added the FDA-listed Paterson, New Jersey production and retail grocery distribution.

  3. Version 47 Aug 2026, 08:46

    Expanded the product-background paragraph with sourced paleta origin and retail-format detail, and added the remaining reference URLs to sources cited.

  4. Version 37 Aug 2026, 03:51

    Removed unsupported details (Food Network flavor description, FDA safety notice citing Paterson, N.J. manufacture and retail grocery distribution); distribution now quoted as the enforcement record states it.

  5. Version 26 Aug 2026, 23:34

    Corrected the product description to the sourced paleta/ice-pop and piña colada definitions, added the FDA notice's detail that the bars were made in Paterson, N.J. and sold in retail grocery freezer cases, and removed unsupported references to Mexican-style popsicles and street vendors.

  6. Version 16 Aug 2026, 17:48

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.