FirstAlerts
Recalls & Safety Alerts

Deli Recalls Jerry Fuel Containers Over Burn and Poisoning Hazards

Official CPSC records announce the recall of about 1,750 portable fuel containers sold on Walmart.com.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 20, 2026, 10:33 a.m. ET
On August 13, 2026, official records from the Consumer Product Safety Commission () announced a recall for Deli Jerry Fuel Containers under recall number . According to records, the recalled fuel containers violate mandatory standards under the Children's Gasoline Burn Prevention Act because the closure is not child-resistant, posing a risk of burns and poisoning to children. The recall involves Deli-branded fuel containers imported by Ningbo DELI IMP. & EXP. Co., Ltd., doing business as Deli OfficeSupplies, of China, and sold on Walmart.com. The recalled items are dark green metal cans featuring a cap and a plastic tube, sold in 5.3-gallon (20-liter), 6.6-gallon (25-liter), and 7.9-gallon (30-liter) capacities. The brand's Star logo and the container capacity are embossed on the side. No injuries have been reported, according to official records. The recall notice states that consumers should stop using the containers immediately and contact Deli OfficeSupplies for a full refund. Consumers are instructed to write "RECALLED" in permanent marker on the product, email a photo of the destroyed container to service@steelitetool.com, and dispose of the product in accordance with local and/or state disposal procedures.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 120 Aug 2026, 14:33current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.