Generac Reports 19 Incidents in Recall of DR Power Lawn Mowers
Generac Power Systems has received 19 reports of lawn mower blades failing to stop, with no injuries reported.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 19, 2026, 7:30 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 19, 2026, 7:30 p.m. ETFirst report
DR Power Lawn Mowers Recalled Over Laceration Hazard
On August 6, 2026, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued recall notice 26648 for about 320 DR Power PRO MAX30 30" Walk-Behind Power Lawn Mowers, in addition to 9 units sold in Canada. According to the CPSC recall notice, the mowers violate the mandatory safety standard for walk-behind power lawn mowers because the blades can operate without the blade control system engaged or continue to operate even after the release of the control, posing a serious laceration hazard.
The recalled mowers were manufactured by Generac Power Systems Inc., of Waukesha, Wisconsin. The CPSC notice describes them as orange and black, with the "DR" logo printed on the black clippings bag, front guard, and top of the motor, and the brand "PRO MAX30" labeled on the front handlebars. The model and serial number are printed on the left side of the mower in front of the rear wheel.
The recall notice lists the affected units in a table headed "Product Model Serial Numbers." Owners should check the plate on their own machine against the Model Serial ranges below, exactly as the CPSC prints them:
- DR Power PRO MAX30 10.6 FPT ES — Model WM25030DEN — Model Serial 3015894821 through 3017342386
- DR Power PRO MAX30 10.6 FPT MS — Model WM25030DMN — Model Serial 3015662325 through 3017342379
- DR Power PRO MAX30 10.6 FPT MS Recon — Model WM25030DMNR — Model Serial 3015913138 through 3015913138
A serial number outside these ranges is not covered by the notice; a serial number falling within them is. According to reference entries from Wikipedia and HowStuffWorks, walk-behind rotary lawn mowers use a horizontal blade spinning inside a protective deck to cut grass.
Generac Power Systems, the manufacturer, reported 19 incidents involving the mower blades staying engaged or not stopping after release of the blade control, according to the CPSC notice. No injuries have been reported.
The CPSC recall notice advises consumers to stop using the recalled mowers immediately unless they have already received a free repair kit in the mail from DR Power and it has been installed. If the repair kit has not been installed, owners should contact DR Power to receive updated repair instructions or to schedule a free repair from an authorized dealer. Owners who have not received a repair kit should contact DR Power Equipment to receive a free repair kit or schedule a free repair from an authorized dealer.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 119 Aug 2026, 23:30current
First published.
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 00:58current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.