Dreyer's Recalls Outshine Fruit Bars Due to Possible Glass Contamination
Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream Inc. is recalling select Outshine Fruit Bars sold nationwide after reports of potential glass contamination.
3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 18, 2026, 2:52 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 18, 2026, 2:53 p.m. ET
Dreyer's Recalls Outshine Fruit Bars Over Possible Glass Contamination
On Aug. 18, 2026, Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream Inc. recalled five flavors of its Outshine Fruit Bars because they may be contaminated with glass, wndu.com reported. The affected products were distributed to stores nationwide.
The recall covers packs of six, 2.5-ounce, paddle-shaped bars featuring best before dates between June 30, 2027, and Nov. 30, 2027. According to wndu.com, no illnesses or injuries have been reported so far.
Customers are being urged to throw away the fruit bars or return them to the store where they were purchased for a full refund.
Aug 18, 2026, 2:52 p.m. ETFirst report
Dreyer's Recalls Outshine Fruit Bars Over Possible Glass Contamination
Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream Inc. is recalling five flavors of its Outshine Fruit Bars because they may be contaminated with glass, according to reporting by WNDU on Aug. 18, 2026. The situation remains open and developing.
The affected products were distributed to stores nationwide and consist of packs of six, 2.5-ounce, paddle-shaped bars. The recall applies to items with best before dates between June 30, 2027, and Nov. 30, 2027.
No illnesses or injuries have been reported so far, WNDU reported. Customers are being urged to throw away the fruit bars or return them to the store where they bought them for a full refund.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 118 Aug 2026, 19:22current
First published.
- Version 118 Aug 2026, 18:52current
First published.
- Version 118 Aug 2026, 18:53current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.