CPSC Announces Expanded Recall of OKK Trading Easter LED Headbands Over Battery Ingestion Hazard
The expanded recall covers about 25,200 Easter LED Headbands that violate mandatory battery safety standards for toys.
3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 19, 2026, 10:40 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m. ET
OKK Trading Recalls Easter LED Headbands Over Battery Ingestion Hazard
On August 6, 2026, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued a recall notice for about 25,200 Easter LED Headbands imported by OKK Trading, Inc., of Vernon, California. According to the CPSC notice (recall number 26662), no injuries have been reported.
The recall covers three models packaged in clear plastic bags labeled "OKK Trading, Inc.": Model 46310 (Item#46310), available in white, light pink, dark pink, turquoise, purple and red with felt multicolor polka dots on the ears; Model 46309 (Item#46309), available in white, light pink, turquoise and purple with fluffy ears and light fur along the band; and Model 44694 (Item#44694), available in white with dark pink, light blue, red or light pink satin ear lining with a fluffy white backing and band.
According to the CPSC, the headbands violate the mandatory safety standard for toys containing button cell and coin batteries because children can easily access the lithium coin batteries. Swallowing button cell or coin batteries poses an ingestion hazard that can cause internal chemical burns, serious injuries, or death.
The CPSC notice directs consumers to stop using the headbands immediately and contact OKK Trading for a refund. To receive a refund, consumers must email recall@okktoys.com a photograph showing the product being properly disposed of in the trash. The notice advises that batteries should be disposed of or recycled following local hazardous waste procedures. Agency database records list no other enforcement actions involving OKK Trading, Inc.
Aug 19, 2026, 10:40 p.m. ETFirst report
OKK Trading Recalls Easter LED Headbands Over Battery Ingestion Hazard
On August 6, 2026, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued an official recall notice for about 25,200 Easter LED Headbands imported by OKK Trading, Inc., of Vernon, California. The recall notice covers three headband models: Model 46310, Model 46309, and Model 44694.
According to the CPSC official recall notice, the headbands violate the mandatory safety standard for toys with button cell and coin batteries because the lithium coin batteries can be accessed easily by children, posing an ingestion hazard. Swallowing button cell or coin batteries can cause serious injuries, internal chemical burns, and death. The CPSC reported that no injuries have been reported.
The recall includes Model 46310 (available in white, light pink, dark pink, turquoise, purple and red with felt multicolor polka dots on the ears), Model 46309 (available in white, light pink, turquoise and purple with fluffy ears and light fur along the band), and Model 44694 (available in white with dark pink, light blue, red or light pink satin ear lining with a fluffy white backing and band). Each headband is packaged in a clear plastic bag labeled with "OKK Trading, Inc." and its corresponding item number: "Item#46310", "Item#46309", or "Item#44694".
The CPSC states that consumers should stop using the Easter LED Headbands immediately and contact OKK Trading for a refund. Consumers will be asked to email recall@okktoys.com a photograph showing the product being properly disposed of in the trash. The notice adds that button cell batteries are hazardous and should be disposed of or recycled by following local hazardous waste procedures. The CPSC database lists no other enforcement actions for OKK Trading, Inc.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 02:53current
First published.
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 02:40current
First published.
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 02:45current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.