FirstAlerts
Recalls & Safety Alerts

FDA Reports Ongoing Recall of CHEER PACK Food Pouches Distributed in Oregon

An ongoing Class II recall covers 322,450 flexible food pouches that may release thin plastic strips into food puree.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 18, 2026, 10:26 a.m. ET
On August 12, 2026, FDA enforcement records documented an and developing recall of 322,450 (4 oz) flexible food pouches manufactured by . The recall was initiated on July 16, 2026, under recall number . According to official FDA records, the pouches were manufactured for packaging Pumpkin Tree Peter Rabbit Organics Banana & Strawberry, 4 oz food puree, bearing UPC 815367010780, with distribution only in Oregon. According to the FDA enforcement report, the recall was designated because the Under FDA definitions, a classification indicates a situation where use of or exposure to a product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences, or where the probability of serious health consequences is remote. FDA enforcement records show no other recall actions listed for . According to food science literature and patent reference documents, the packaging item (#CP6088) is an empty, spouted 3-layer foil container made of an outer plastic film, a middle aluminum foil barrier, and an inner heat-sealable polyolefin layer. Such pouches are bulk business-to-business items shipped to food manufacturers and packers rather than sold directly to consumers.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 118 Aug 2026, 14:26current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.