Great Value Organic Triple Berry Blend Recalled Over Possible E. coli Contamination
The FDA announced a recall of frozen organic berries sold at Walmart in 16 states due to possible E. coli contamination.
3 reports on this incident · first at Sep 4, 2026, 9:48 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 4, 2026, 9:52 a.m. ET
Walmart Frozen Berry Recall Expanded Over Possible E. coli Contamination
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has announced an expanded recall of Great Value brand organic triple berry blend sold at Walmart stores in 16 states, according to WNDU.com. The recall, issued by Frutas y Hortalizas del Sur S.A., is due to possible E. coli contamination.
The product is a 10-ounce package of organic triple berry blend containing strawberries, blackberries, and blueberries. Consumers who have the recalled product should return it to Walmart for a full refund, the FDA said.
No one has reported getting sick from the frozen berries, according to WNDU.com.
Sep 4, 2026, 9:48 a.m. ETFirst report
Frozen Berry Blend Sold at Walmart Recalled Over Possible E. coli Contamination
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced a recall of Great Value brand organic triple berry blend, which includes strawberries, blackberries and blueberries in a 10-ounce package, according to a report by WNDU. The product was distributed to Walmart stores in 16 states.
The recall was initiated by Frutas y Hortalizas del Sur S.A. due to possible E. coli contamination. No one has reported getting sick from the frozen berries, according to WNDU.
Consumers who purchased the recalled product should return the package to Walmart for a full refund, as stated in the FDA notice.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 24 Sept 2026, 14:18current
Corrected to state no illnesses reported, per both sources; removed erroneous claim of reported illnesses.
- Version 14 Sept 2026, 13:52current
First published.
- Version 14 Sept 2026, 13:48current
First published.
- Version 14 Sept 2026, 13:52
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.