Goal Zero Recalls YETI 3000X Power Stations After Reports of Fire, Overheating
The CPSC says Goal Zero has received four reports of the power stations catching fire, overheating, and smoking, but no injuries have been reported.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 20, 2026, 6:51 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 20, 2026, 6:51 p.m. ETFirst report
Goal Zero Recalls YETI 3000X Power Stations Over Fire and Burn Hazard
Goal Zero, of Draper, Utah, has recalled its YETI 3000X Portable Power Stations, according to a recall notice from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) dated August 20, 2026. The recall was initiated because the power station's circuit board can overheat, posing a risk of serious injury from fire and burn hazards.
The recalled power stations are silver and black, measure about 24.4 inches high, 18.5 inches wide, and 22.3 inches deep, and weigh about 92 pounds. They have yellow handles, a digital display, and sit on a rolling cart with two wheels and a telescoping handle. The Goal Zero logo is printed on the front bar of the cart and on a nameplate under the lid, along with "YETI 3000X."
Goal Zero has received four reports of the power stations catching fire, overheating, and smoking. No injuries have been reported. The recall involves about 46,200 units.
The recall notice does not provide model numbers or serial numbers for the affected units, so consumers should use the product description to identify whether their unit is included.
Consumers should stop using the power stations immediately and install the free repair, a firmware update available through the Goal Zero application, or contact Goal Zero for firmware installation at no cost. The CPSC recall number is 26712.
The CPSC database records no other enforcement action by this firm.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 22:51current
First published.
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 22:52current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.