FirstAlerts
Recalls & Safety AlertsVersion 5

The Hampton Grocers Recalls Lacnola Lactation Granola Over Possible Salmonella

The FDA says a sample of the organic moringa powder used in the lactation granola tested positive for Salmonella. No illnesses have been reported.

3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 15, 2026, 8:25 p.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 15, 2026, 1:03 p.m. ETUpdated Aug 17, 2026, 8:37 p.m. ET
Developing · checked 11h ago

This recall is open. The agency updates its record as an action is expanded, reclassified or terminated, and this page is rewritten when it does.

We last searched for new coverage of this at Aug 17, 2026, 10:07 p.m. ET — checked 11h ago.

, has recalled its Lacnola Lactation Granola because the product , according to the FDA. A sample of the organic moringa powder used in the granola tested positive for Salmonella, the FDA said. The recall covers . The affected product carries an expiration date of either Oct. 21, 2026, or Feb. 13, 2027. The granola was .

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 15, 2026, 9:12 p.m. ET

    Hampton Grocers Expands Recall of Lacnola Lactation Granola Over Salmonella Risk

    An expanded recall for Lacnola Lactation Granola now covers products marked with an expiration date of either Oct. 21, 2026, or Feb. 13, 2027, according to reporting by KMVT, KWCH, and KWTX. The FDA-announced recall involves Lacnola Lactation Granola, packaged in a pink 8-ounce pouch, from firm Hampton Grocers. The recall was issued because the granola may be contaminated with Salmonella. KMVT and KWTX reported that a sample of the organic moringa powder used in the granola tested positive for Salmonella. In the same breath, KWCH reported that the company learned from the supplier of the organic moringa powder used in the granola that a sample of the powder had tested positive for Salmonella. The recalled product was distributed nationwide online through various retailers, including Amazon, between October 2025 and Aug. 12, 2026, KMVT, KWCH, and KWTX reported. No illnesses have been reported. Consumers are advised to throw the product away and contact the place of purchase for a full refund.

  2. Aug 15, 2026, 8:25 p.m. ETFirst report

    Hampton Grocers Recalls Lacnola Lactation Granola Over Salmonella Concerns

    Hampton Grocers is recalling Lacnola Lactation Granola due to potential Salmonella contamination in a developing situation reported by kmvt.com, kwch.com, and kwtx.com citing the FDA. The product is packaged in a pink 8-ounce pouch under the Lacnola brand name, with an expiration date of either Oct. 21, 2026, or Feb. 13, 2027.

    According to kmvt.com and kwtx.com, a sample of the organic moringa powder used in the granola tested positive for Salmonella, whereas kwch.com reported that the company learned from the supplier of the organic moringa powder that a sample of the powder had tested positive for Salmonella. The granola was distributed nationwide online through various retailers, including Amazon, between October 2025 and Aug. 12, 2026.

    No illnesses have been reported, according to reports from kmvt.com, kwch.com, and kwtx.com. Consumers are advised to throw the product away and contact the place of purchase for a full refund.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 518 Aug 2026, 00:37current

    Updated story to incorporate reporting and competing details from gizmodo.com.

  2. Version 416 Aug 2026, 22:41

    Added reporting and attribution from alaskasnewssource.com.

  3. Version 316 Aug 2026, 05:23

    Added wave3.com to reporting attributions across the story.

  4. Version 216 Aug 2026, 01:45

    Updated attributions and sources cited to include 29news.com throughout the story.

  5. Version 116 Aug 2026, 00:25current

    First published.

  6. Version 116 Aug 2026, 01:12current

    First published.

  7. Version 116 Aug 2026, 00:56

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.