Jaime's Foods ATX Expands Jalapeno Ranch Recall to Additional Lot Codes
The FDA's enforcement report lists six identifying codes for the Austin firm's 16 oz. Jalapeno Ranch jars, recalled over an undeclared egg allergen.
4 reports on this incident · first at Sep 9, 2026, 10:10 p.m. ET
This recall is open. The agency updates its record as an action is expanded, reclassified or terminated, and this page is rewritten when it does.
We last searched for new coverage of this at Sep 9, 2026, 8:11 p.m. ET — checked 3h ago.
Earlier reports
Sep 9, 2026, 10:28 p.m. ET
FDA Classifies Jaime's Foods ATX Jalapeno Ranch Recall as Class I
The FDA's enforcement report for recall number H-1301-2026 lists the Jaime's Foods ATX, LLC Jalapeno Ranch recall as Class I, the agency's most serious category, used where there is a reasonable probability that using the product will cause serious harm or death, according to the FDA's recall definitions.
The recall covers Jalapeno Ranch packed in 16 oz. glass jars, 6 jars per case, with UPC #199284564923, according to the enforcement report. The report lists 102 cases and identifies the reason as an undeclared egg allergen. The firm is listed in Austin, Texas, and the distribution is listed as Texas.
The FDA's enforcement report gives the recall number as H-1301-2026, the report date as September 2, 2026, and the initiation date as August 5, 2026. The status is listed as ongoing. The identifying codes listed are 69, 86, 108, 113, 116, and 121.
An undeclared allergen is an ingredient the label does not name. The FDA says people who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to it run the risk of a serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they eat the product; anyone without that allergy is not affected. The agency's database records no other enforcement action by this firm.
Sep 9, 2026, 10:23 p.m. ET
FDA Closes Jaime's Foods ATX Jalapeno Ranch Recall Over Undeclared Egg
The FDA has closed its recall of Jalapeno Ranch made by Jaime's Foods ATX, LLC of Austin, Texas, according to the agency's enforcement report for recall number H-1301-2026. The report lists the status as "Terminated," meaning the agency considers the recall carried out.
The recall, initiated on August 5, 2026 and reported on September 2, 2026, covered 102 cases of Jalapeno Ranch packed in 16 oz. glass jars, six jars per case, distributed in Texas. The reason given in the enforcement report is an undeclared egg allergen. The FDA classifies the action as Class I, its most serious category, used where there is a reasonable probability that using the product will cause serious harm or death.
Anyone who still has the product can identify it by the UPC #199284564923 on the label and by the codes 69, 86, 108, 113, 116, and 121. The FDA says an undeclared allergen is an ingredient the label does not name, and that people with an allergy or severe sensitivity to it run the risk of a serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they eat the product; anyone without that allergy is not affected.
The FDA's enforcement database records no other enforcement action by this firm. Over the last two years, 724 food recalls in the agency's database cite an undeclared allergen, including actions reported on September 2, 2026 involving glutinous rice balls from KHONG GUAN (HQ) and shortbread cookies from Lidl US Trading. Those other firms' recalls are not evidence about this one.
Sep 9, 2026, 10:10 p.m. ETFirst report
Jaime's Foods ATX Recalls Jalapeno Ranch Over Undeclared Egg
Jaime's Foods ATX, LLC, of Austin, Texas, is recalling Jalapeno Ranch packed in 16 oz. glass jars, six jars per case, because of an undeclared egg allergen, according to an FDA enforcement report. The recall, number H-1301-2026, was initiated on August 5, 2026, and reported on September 2, 2026, and covers 102 cases distributed in Texas. The product carries UPC #199284564923 and identifying codes 69, 86, 108, 113, 116, and 121. The FDA classifies the action as Class I, its most serious category, used where there is a reasonable probability that using the product will cause serious harm or death. The recall is ongoing.
The FDA says an undeclared allergen is an ingredient the label does not name, and that people who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to it run the risk of a serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they eat the product; anyone without that allergy is not affected. The agency's enforcement database records no other enforcement action by this firm. In the last two years, 724 food recalls in the agency's database cite undeclared allergen, including four dated September 2, 2026, involving KHONG GUAN glutinous rice balls and Lidl US Trading shortbread cookies.
Jalapeño ranch is a creamy condiment, dip, and salad dressing made from a ranch base of mayonnaise, buttermilk, or sour cream combined with garlic, herbs, and jalapeño peppers, normally sold as a supermarket item in retail glass jars or plastic squeeze bottles, according to background sources. The notice's unit count and pack size work out to approximately 1,600 ounces, a figure calculated from those numbers rather than stated by the agency.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 110 Sept 2026, 02:34current
First published.
- Version 110 Sept 2026, 02:10current
First published.
- Version 110 Sept 2026, 02:28current
First published.
- Version 110 Sept 2026, 02:23current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.