FDA Class I Recall: Kian Pee Wan Capsules Contain Undeclared Drug Ingredients

Buy-Herbal recalls 71 bottles of Kian Pee Wan Capsules sold on eBay because they contain undeclared dexamethasone and cyproheptadine.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 25, 2026, 4:01 p.m. ET

Developing · checked 39 min ago

This recall is open. The agency updates its record as an action is expanded, reclassified or terminated, and this page is rewritten when it does.

We last searched for new coverage of this at Aug 25, 2026, 6:09 p.m. ET — checked 39 min ago.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a recall for , distributed by of , NY. The recall, initiated on March 21, 2026, and reported on August 19, 2026, covers all lots within expiry, totaling . The product was sold to individual consumers via an eBay third-party seller. The FDA's enforcement report (recall number ) states the product is being recalled because it is marketed without an approved New Drug Application (NDA) or Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) and contains undeclared drug ingredients dexamethasone and cyproheptadine. The recall is . According to the FDA, a recall is the most serious category, used when there is a reasonable probability that using the product will cause serious harm or death. The FDA notes that undeclared ingredients can pose risks to individuals with allergies or sensitivities; however, the agency's report does not specify the health risks associated with these particular undeclared drugs. The FDA's database records no other enforcement actions by . The product is a dietary supplement intended for oral consumption, according to FDA background information. Identifying code: All lots within expiry.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

Version 125 Aug 2026, 20:01current
First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.