L-Nutra Recalls Prolon Almond and Cocoa Spread Due to Undeclared Tree Nuts
L-Nutra has issued a recall for a lot of Prolon Apulian Almond and Cocoa Spread that may contain undeclared cashew, pistachio, and hazelnut.
4 reports on this incident · first at Aug 18, 2026, 4:45 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 18, 2026, 5:28 p.m. ET
One Allergic Reaction Documented in Prolon Almond and Cocoa Spread Recall
L-Nutra has documented one confirmed allergic reaction linked to its product, according to Medical Daily. The FDA-reported recall involves Prolon brand Apulian Almond and Cocoa Spread, which contains undeclared cashew, pistachio, and hazelnut.
For individuals allergic to cashews, pistachios, or hazelnuts, exposure can cause a serious or life-threatening reaction within minutes. The recall applies to 8.47-ounce glass jars bearing UPC 850040360530, lot code L2755, and an expiration date of January 2, 2027. Distributed by L-Nutra of Culver City, California, the spread was sold through ProlonLife.com directly or in certain Prolon bundles, and was not sold in grocery stores.
The company stated that the recall is limited to one lot and that the cause of the cross-contact remains under investigation. Consumers with the recalled lot should stop eating it immediately and either discard it or complete the company's recall response form to arrange a return.
Aug 18, 2026, 4:54 p.m. ET
FDA Closes Recall of Prolon Almond and Cocoa Spread
The FDA has closed its recall action for Prolon brand Apulian Almond and Cocoa Spread, indicating the agency considers the recall carried out. The product, packaged in 8.47-ounce glass jars, was distributed by L-Nutra of Culver City, California.
For consumers who still have the product, the recall applies to jars with UPC 850040360530, lot L2755, and an expiration date of January 2, 2027. The item was sold online through ProlonLife.com, either purchased directly or included in certain Prolon bundles, and was not sold in grocery stores.
The recall was launched after the product was found to contain undeclared cashew, pistachio, and hazelnut, which can trigger a serious or life-threatening reaction in allergic individuals. L-Nutra documented one confirmed allergic reaction linked to the spread. Consumers with the recalled lot should stop eating it immediately and either discard it or complete the company's recall response form to arrange a return.
Aug 18, 2026, 4:45 p.m. ETFirst report
L-Nutra Recalls Prolon Almond and Cocoa Spread Over Undeclared Tree Nuts
L-Nutra of Culver City, California, is recalling Prolon brand Apulian Almond and Cocoa Spread because it contains undeclared cashew, pistachio, and hazelnut, according to FDA details reported by Medical Daily. The exact date of the recall has not been established. The open recall is limited to a single lot at this stage.
The recalled product comes in 8.47-ounce glass jars labeled with UPC 850040360530, lot code L2755, and an expiration date of January 2, 2027. The spread was distributed through the company's e-commerce website, ProlonLife.com, as a direct purchase or as part of certain Prolon bundles. The product was not sold in grocery stores.
People allergic to cashews, pistachios, or hazelnuts can experience a serious or life-threatening reaction beginning within minutes, Medical Daily reported. The company has documented one confirmed allergic reaction linked to the product. The cause of the cross-contact has not been determined and remains under investigation by the company. Consumers who have the recalled lot should stop eating it immediately and either discard it or complete the company's recall response form to arrange a return.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 118 Aug 2026, 21:30current
First published.
- Version 118 Aug 2026, 20:45current
First published.
- Version 118 Aug 2026, 21:28current
First published.
- Version 118 Aug 2026, 20:54current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.