Fitueyes Expands Recall of Laziza Dressers Over Tip-Over Hazard
An expanded recall notice covers Laziza 3-in-1 dressers that violate STURDY Act stability standards.
3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 19, 2026, 7:45 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 19, 2026, 7:54 p.m. ET
CPSC Issues Recall Notice for Fitueyes Laziza Dressers
On August 6, 2026, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued recall number 26676 for about 150 Laziza-branded 3-in-1 dressers distributed by Fitueyes, Inc., of City of Industry, California. According to the CPSC recall notice, no injuries have been reported.
The CPSC states that the recalled dressers are unstable if not anchored to the wall, posing tip-over and entrapment hazards that can result in serious injuries or death to children and violating mandatory safety standards required by the STURDY Act. The wooden dressers were sold in white, dark brown, or light brown, weigh 82 pounds, and measure about 31.4 inches long, 15.4 inches wide, and 31.9 inches high. Affected units have model number WE11E5080Wx3-W, WE11E5081Rx3-W, or WE11E5081R and batch number SME2025112805 or SME2025102401 printed on a label on the back.
The agency advises consumers to stop using unanchored dressers immediately, place them where children cannot access them, and contact Fitueyes for a full refund. Consumers must mark "recalled" on the top and all sides with a permanent marker, email a photo of the marked dresser to lazizadresserrecall@s-homooi.com, and then dispose of the product. CPSC records show no other enforcement actions listed for Fitueyes, Inc.
Aug 19, 2026, 7:45 p.m. ETFirst report
Fitueyes Recalls Laziza Dressers Over Tip-Over Hazard
On August 6, 2026, Fitueyes, Inc., of City of Industry, California, recalled about 150 Laziza-branded 3-in-1 dressers, according to a Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) recall notice under recall number 26676.
According to the CPSC notice, the wooden dressers were sold in white, dark brown, or light brown. Each dresser has three drawers, measures about 31.4 inches long, 15.4 inches wide, and 31.9 inches high, and weighs 82 pounds. Printed on a label on the back is "Three Drawer Dresser," model number WE11E5080Wx3-W or WE11E5081Rx3-W (also listed as model number WE11E5081R), and batch number SME2025112805 or SME2025102401.
The CPSC stated that the recalled dressers are unstable if not anchored to the wall, posing tip-over and entrapment hazards that can result in risks of serious injuries or death to children. The dressers violate the mandatory safety standard required by the STURDY Act. No injuries have been reported. CPSC database records list no other enforcement actions for Fitueyes, Inc.
The CPSC notice states that consumers should stop using the dressers immediately if they are not anchored to the wall and place them in an area children cannot access. Consumers should contact Fitueyes for a full refund, write "recalled" on the top and all sides of the dresser with a permanent marker, submit a photo to lazizadresserrecall@s-homooi.com, and then dispose of the product.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 00:24current
First published.
- Version 119 Aug 2026, 23:45current
First published.
- Version 119 Aug 2026, 23:54current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.