CPSC Expands Recall of Loyoda Adult Portable Bed Rails Due to Entrapment and Asphyxiation Hazards
The recall now includes all Loyoda Adult Portable Bed Rails with model FBL140202 manufactured before December 15, 2025, due to risks of entrapment, falls, and lacerations.
3 reports on this incident · first at Sep 3, 2026, 12:52 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 3, 2026, 1:24 p.m. ET
CPSC Recalls Loyoda Adult Portable Bed Rails Due to Entrapment, Fall, and Laceration Hazards
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced a recall of Loyoda Adult Portable Bed Rails on September 3, 2026. No injuries have been reported in connection with this recall.
The recall involves Loyoda-branded adult portable bed rails, model FBL140202, manufactured before December 15, 2025. The bed rails violate the mandatory standard for adult portable bed rails because users can become entrapped within the bed rail or between the bed rail and the side of the mattress, posing a serious entrapment hazard and risk of death by asphyxiation. The bed rails also fail to meet retention strap requirements, posing a fall hazard, and have incorrectly sized push pins and push pin holes, posing a laceration hazard. Additionally, the bed rails do not bear the required hazard warning labels.
Consumers should stop using the recalled bed rails immediately and contact Loyoda for a full refund. Loyoda asks consumers to cut the black safety strap in half, write “RECALLED” on the upper and lower bed rails with a permanent marker, take a photo, and email it to support@loyoda.com to receive a refund. About 2,200 units were sold on Amazon by Loyoda Direct and Loyoda.
Sep 3, 2026, 12:52 p.m. ETFirst report
Loyoda Adult Portable Bed Rails Recalled Due to Entrapment and Asphyxiation Hazards
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced a recall on September 3, 2026, for Loyoda Adult Portable Bed Rails. The recall, number 26733, involves about 2,200 units sold on Amazon by Loyoda Direct and Loyoda. The bed rails violate the mandatory standard for adult portable bed rails because users can become entrapped within the rail or between the rail and the mattress, posing a risk of death by asphyxiation. They also fail to meet retention strap requirements, posing a fall hazard, and have incorrectly sized push pins and holes, posing a laceration hazard. The rails lack required hazard warning labels. No injuries have been reported.
The recalled bed rails are silver, measure 13.38 inches wide by 17.71 inches tall, and can extend to 20.47 inches tall. They bear the labels "Loyoda" and model number "FBL140202." Only units manufactured before December 15, 2025, are included. The manufacture date and model number are printed on the packaging.
Consumers should stop using the recalled bed rails immediately and contact Loyoda for a full refund. They will be asked to cut the black safety strap in half, write "RECALLED" on the upper and lower rails with a permanent marker, take a photo, and email it to support@loyoda.com to receive the refund.
According to the CPSC recall notice, the agency's database records no other enforcement action by this firm.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 13 Sept 2026, 17:26current
First published.
- Version 13 Sept 2026, 16:52current
First published.
- Version 13 Sept 2026, 17:24current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.