FDA Records Class II Recall of Major Pharmaceuticals Levothyroxine Tablets Over Subpotency
The agency's enforcement report for recall D-0705-2026 lists one lot of 125 mcg levothyroxine sodium tablets, distributed nationwide, with the action ongoing.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- https://api.fda.gov/food/enforcement.json?search=recall_number:%22D-0705-2026%22
- https://www.fda.gov/safety/industry-guidance-recalls/recalls-background-and-definitions
- https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=fca88c97-5cd4-4834-ba87-deb5bd637788
- https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=e8e723a9-1bc9-4b1e-95e1-9b1e9ab2029f
- https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/cpg-sec-430100-unit-dose-labeling-solid-and-liquid-oral-dosage-forms
- https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2002/02/01/02-2548/amendment-of-regulations-regarding-certain-label-statements-on-prescription-drugs
Revision history
- Version 67 Aug 2026, 13:55current
No new facts; added headline and dek and retained the v5 text unchanged.
- Version 57 Aug 2026, 11:48
Product background updated to the DailyMed/FDA reference data: corrected chemical description and excipient list, and added that the 10 x 10 unit-dose blister carton is the format FDA describes as typical for institutional settings such as hospitals.
- Version 47 Aug 2026, 07:07
Corrected product background to match the cited references — removed the unsupported "chemically identical to T4" wording and the 25–300 mcg strength range, added the compound formula and CAS number and named PubChem and DailyMed as the sources.
- Version 37 Aug 2026, 02:11
Replaced the PubChem-sourced chemical description (molecular formula, animal-gland isolation) with the DailyMed labeling description, added the blister/strength-range packaging detail, and cited the DailyMed label URLs.
- Version 26 Aug 2026, 21:27
Replaced unsourced Wikipedia-based chemistry description with PubChem and DailyMed reference data, and corrected the packaging/distribution background to the sourced description.
- Version 16 Aug 2026, 17:12
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.