FDA Records Class II Recall of Levothyroxine Sodium Tablets Over Subpotency
An FDA enforcement report lists a nationwide recall of 125 mcg levothyroxine sodium unit-dose tablets packaged by Major Pharmaceuticals, initiated July 13, 2026.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- https://api.fda.gov/food/enforcement.json?search=recall_number:%22D-0710-2026%22
- https://www.fda.gov/safety/industry-guidance-recalls/recalls-background-and-definitions
- https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=40840f67-7066-4bb6-85c1-73eb2618cd26
- https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=fca88c97-5cd4-4834-ba87-deb5bd637788
- https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/021342s016lbl.pdf
- https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/cpg-sec-430100-unit-dose-labeling-solid-and-liquid-oral-dosage-forms
Revision history
- Version 67 Aug 2026, 13:55current
Added headline and dek, moved the firm's clean enforcement history up beside the Class II definition, and split the product background into two paragraphs; no facts changed.
- Version 57 Aug 2026, 10:58
Product background revised to match supplied reference sources: added empirical formula, USP monograph explanation and full inactive-ingredient list; removed the PubChem citation and the unsupported claim about twelve dose strengths and color additives.
- Version 47 Aug 2026, 06:01
Replaced the product background with DailyMed/PubChem-sourced detail (synthetic T4 salt, inactive ingredients, twelve strengths, FDA unit-dose definition), dropped the unsourced veterinary-formulation and colour/imprint lines and the converted 0.125 mg figure, and added the supporting reference URLs.
- Version 37 Aug 2026, 01:25
Product background re-sourced to the National Library of Medicine's PubChem thyroxine entry, replacing the DailyMed-based description, and a note added that veterinary levothyroxine formulations are separate products.
- Version 26 Aug 2026, 21:06
Corrected the product background to the DailyMed label description (excipients, 25–300 mcg strength range, dispensing settings) and added the reference source links.
- Version 16 Aug 2026, 16:31
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.