FDA Lists Class II Recall of Levothyroxine Sodium Tablets, 150 mcg, for Subpotency
An FDA enforcement report, recall number D-0711-2026, lists Major Pharmaceuticals recalling one lot of unit-dose levothyroxine tablets distributed nationwide, with the action listed as ongoing.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- https://api.fda.gov/food/enforcement.json?search=recall_number:%22D-0711-2026%22
- https://www.fda.gov/safety/industry-guidance-recalls/recalls-background-and-definitions
- https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=18717e58-89fb-4e2f-93b6-d6ac3e988d37
- https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/56/NCT04782856/Prot_SAP_001.pdf
- https://image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/11096915
- https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2002/02/01/02-2548/amendment-of-regulations-regarding-certain-label-statements-on-prescription-drugs
Revision history
- Version 67 Aug 2026, 15:25current
Added headline and dek; body unchanged in substance from v5.
- Version 57 Aug 2026, 11:14
Added DailyMed labelling and the "Rx only" federal labelling requirement to the product background, corrected the per-tablet strength wording to match the label sources, and named the pharmacies, hospitals and care facilities that hold unit-dose stock.
- Version 47 Aug 2026, 05:49
Replaced the DailyMed-sourced product background (molecular weight, inactive ingredients) with the sourced product description from ClinicalTrials.gov protocols and patent literature, and added those source URLs.
- Version 37 Aug 2026, 01:37
Added source URLs for the enforcement record, classification definition and product background; removed the uncited NCATS reference; wrote dates out in full and noted the background says nothing about this recall.
- Version 26 Aug 2026, 21:56
Corrected and re-sourced the product background to DailyMed, NCATS and FDA unit-dose guidance, removing uncited molecular weight, dose and distribution-chain details; added headline, dek and source links.
- Version 16 Aug 2026, 16:42
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.