FDA Records Class II Recall of 25 mcg Levothyroxine Tablets for Subpotency
An FDA enforcement report lists an ongoing nationwide recall of one lot of Major Pharmaceuticals levothyroxine sodium tablets, initiated July 13, 2026.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- https://api.fda.gov/food/enforcement.json?search=recall_number:%22D-0707-2026%22
- https://www.fda.gov/safety/industry-guidance-recalls/recalls-background-and-definitions
- https://go.drugbank.com/salts/DBSALT000244
- https://image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/11096915
- https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=333642fd-93ae-4dc0-9c83-6d6b163c1c74
- https://www.cms.gov/medicare/prescription-drug-coverage/prescriptiondrugcovcontra/downloads/part-d-benefits-manual-chapter-6.pdf
Revision history
- Version 67 Aug 2026, 14:40current
No new facts in the record; tightened wording and removed the "developing" note, with the recall status still listed as ongoing.
- Version 57 Aug 2026, 10:36
Replaced uncited chemical formula and molecular weight with sourced product background, added excipients, strength range and Rx-only labeling citation.
- Version 47 Aug 2026, 06:21
Rewrote the product-background section to match sourced reference data (synthetic origin, molecular weight, USP standard, unit-dose distribution), removed the unsupported animal-thyroid derivation claim, and added the supporting source URLs.
- Version 37 Aug 2026, 01:08
Replaced the DailyMed-based product background with the clinical trial protocol and USPTO patent sources now supplied, and added the nationwide USA distribution detail from the enforcement record.
- Version 26 Aug 2026, 20:38
Replaced the product background with DailyMed labelling detail (chemical identity, formula, strengths, inactive ingredients, administration) and added the packaging/dispensing context, with sources cited.
- Version 16 Aug 2026, 16:07
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.