FDA Records Class II Recall of Subpotent 50 mcg Levothyroxine Tablets
An FDA enforcement report lists an ongoing nationwide recall of unit-dose levothyroxine sodium tablets packaged and distributed by Major Pharmaceuticals, initiated July 13, 2026.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- https://api.fda.gov/food/enforcement.json?search=recall_number:%22D-0708-2026%22
- https://www.fda.gov/safety/industry-guidance-recalls/recalls-background-and-definitions
- https://drugs.ncats.io/drug/054I36CPMN
- https://doi.usp.org/USPNF/USPNF_M45020_05_01.html
- https://www.uspnf.com/notices/retired-compendial-notices/usp-announces-revised-monograph-levothyroxine-sodium-tablets
- https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=e95720f2-91c9-a6d0-f7d5-8bcb94d07bbc
Revision history
- Version 67 Aug 2026, 14:56current
Condensed the product-description paragraphs into one and tightened the headline and dek; no facts added or removed.
- Version 57 Aug 2026, 11:39
Replaced patent-derived product background with USP monograph detail (95.0–105.0% content requirement) and the FDA's description of unit-dose packaging, and added the supporting reference URLs.
- Version 47 Aug 2026, 05:24
Product-background paragraph rewritten to match the sourced reference data (synthetic T4 sodium salt, CAS number, USP standards, patent sources) and unsupported excipient list removed; patent sources added to citations.
- Version 37 Aug 2026, 02:05
Added headline and dek; expanded the product description with the DailyMed-listed synthetic T4 composition and inactive ingredients.
- Version 26 Aug 2026, 21:29
Rewrote the product-description paragraph to match the DailyMed-sourced reference wording and added who typically stocks and receives the unit-dose cartons; added headline and dek.
- Version 16 Aug 2026, 17:11
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.