FDA Records Class II Recall of Subpotent Levothyroxine Tablets Distributed Nationwide
Enforcement report D-0709-2026 lists an ongoing recall of 75 mcg levothyroxine sodium tablets packaged by Major Pharmaceuticals, initiated July 13, 2026.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- https://api.fda.gov/food/enforcement.json?search=recall_number:%22D-0709-2026%22
- https://www.fda.gov/safety/industry-guidance-recalls/recalls-background-and-definitions
- https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/56/NCT04782856/Prot_SAP_001.pdf
- https://image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/11938109
- https://image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/11154498
Revision history
- Version 77 Aug 2026, 14:27current
FDA Records Class II Recall of Subpotent Levothyroxine Tablets Distributed Nationwide
- Version 67 Aug 2026, 11:26
Added a headline and dek, and replaced the unsupported DailyMed/Orange Book/Wikipedia product background (and its formula and packaging-style claims) with the sourced prescribing-information and patent references.
- Version 57 Aug 2026, 05:35
Trimmed the product-background paragraph to only what the cited references supply (removing molecular weight and excipient details), named and linked those references, and added the FDA enforcement report and classification-definition URLs to sources.
- Version 47 Aug 2026, 01:54
Removed the uncited reference to a 25–300 mcg strength range; added the molecular weight, the full inactive-ingredient list, the 'Rx only' labelling basis and NDC tracking from the product references.
- Version 36 Aug 2026, 21:42
Corrected the product-background paragraph to match the reference data (inactive ingredients, strength range, unit-dose definition) and added the supporting source links.
- Version 26 Aug 2026, 17:02
Corrected the chemical description to match the cited product references, removed the unsupported molecular weight and list of other strengths, added tablet composition and packaging detail, and added the source URLs.
- Version 16 Aug 2026, 14:18
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.