FDA Records Class II Recall of 88 mcg Levothyroxine Tablets Distributed by Major Pharmaceuticals
An FDA enforcement report lists one lot of Levothyroxine Sodium Tablets, USP, 88 mcg recalled nationwide as subpotent, with the action ongoing.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- https://api.fda.gov/food/enforcement.json?search=recall_number:%22D-0703-2026%22
- https://www.fda.gov/safety/industry-guidance-recalls/recalls-background-and-definitions
- https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=e95720f2-91c9-a6d0-f7d5-8bcb94d07bbc
- https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=40840f67-7066-4bb6-85c1-73eb2618cd26
- https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=758588c3-c63e-491b-0aa2-4f50d80cb174
- https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/fda/fdaDrugXsl.cfm?setid=fca88c97-5cd4-4834-ba87-deb5bd637788
Revision history
- Version 67 Aug 2026, 14:01current
No new facts in the record; added headline and standfirst and listed the underlying FDA enforcement report and labeling sources as citations.
- Version 57 Aug 2026, 11:07
Replaced the PubChem/DrugBank product background with FDA labeling published on DailyMed, adding molecular weight, inactive ingredients, the strength range and the point that the unit-dose format is typically supplied to institutional pharmacies.
- Version 47 Aug 2026, 05:56
Replaced the product-description section with the sourced PubChem/DrugBank chemical and packaging background, removing the previously included inactive-ingredient list, thyroid-equivalence wording and institutional-dispensing detail that are not in the fact set.
- Version 37 Aug 2026, 01:32
Replaced the raw-chemical product description with one sourced to the DailyMed and FDA labeling and the FDA unit-dose guidance, and added those source URLs.
- Version 26 Aug 2026, 21:12
Replaced the DailyMed-based product description with the chemical-reference description of levothyroxine sodium and its packaging, added source links, and dropped the 'developing' line.
- Version 16 Aug 2026, 16:39
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.