FDA Lists Class II Recall of Man Fon Wonton Wrappers Over Unlabeled Wheat and Dyes; No Lot Codes Listed
An FDA enforcement report dated July 29, 2026 records an ongoing recall of unlabeled wonton wrappers distributed to California restaurants and, through a wholesaler, to New Mexico grocery stores. The record gives no lot numbers or date codes, and states the bags carry no ingredient labeling.
By AI ReporterWritten Aug 7, 2026, 10:52 a.m. ET
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's enforcement report, recall number , records an recall by of wonton wrappers. The record gives the reason as "" The recall was initiated on July 8, 2026, and the report date is July 29, 2026. The action is listed as , and this account is developing.
**There are no identifying codes.** The enforcement record for supplies no lot numbers, batch codes, UPC numbers, or best-by or production dates for the recalled wrappers. Readers should not treat the absence of a code on a package as evidence that the package falls outside this recall; on this record, there is no code to match against. The record also does not list a consumer contact or phone number for the firm.
What the record does give is the pack description. According to the enforcement record, the products are wonton wrappers packed into clear flexible plastic bags and sold as 40 units (16oz bags)/case, and wonton wrappers packed into "Wonton Noodles Net Wt. 5 LBS" plastic bags and sold as 10 units (4-lb bags)/case. The record states neither product has ingredient labeling information — so a bag matching one of those descriptions and carrying no ingredient list is consistent with what the FDA recorded. The recall quantity is listed as "," which is the only figure the record gives bearing on how much product is involved. Distribution is recorded as primarily to local restaurants in California, with some of the product intended for retail distribution in grocery stores via a wholesaler in New Mexico.
The FDA defines as its middle category, used where a product may cause temporary or medically reversible harm and where the chance of serious harm is remote. On undeclared allergens, the FDA says an undeclared allergen is an ingredient the label does not name, and that people with an allergy or severe sensitivity to it run the risk of a serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they eat the product; anyone without that allergy is not affected.
Wonton wrappers, also called wonton skins, are thin pre-cut sheets of unleavened wheat-flour dough — an egg-noodle dough of wheat flour, water and usually egg, sometimes with salt — rolled thin and cut into squares roughly 3.5 inches across, according to food reference sources including Wikipedia and CooksInfo. They are a raw dough product meant to be cooked. A 16 oz bag is a consumer retail item, while 4 lb bags sold ten to a case are a trade pack for restaurants, caterers and food manufacturers.
The FDA's recall database lists two other actions by this firm, both separate entries from : a recall dated July 29, 2026 of "Man Fon Inc. Won Ton Wrappers Extra Thin; Net Wt. 10 oz; UPC# 757168 9" for undeclared colors Yellow#5 and Yellow#6, and a recall dated February 13, 2013 of Yangchun Noodles, 10 case, 12 bags per case, over undeclared wheat. The UPC in that first entry identifies the product in that separate action; it is not an identifier for the product recalled under , which carries none. That history is context only and says nothing about fault in this action. The same database records 745 food recalls citing an undeclared allergen over the past two years; other firms' recalls are not evidence about this one.
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.