FirstAlerts

FDA notice on recalled Hudson RCI infant breathing circuits reports no known serious health consequences

The agency's recall posting states Medline is not aware of any serious health consequences from use of the neonatal and infant heated wire breathing circuits it recalled nationwide.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 6, 2026, 12:00 a.m. ETWritten Aug 7, 2026, 8:56 p.m. ET

More on this incident

The FDA's recall posting on 's nationwide recall of states that, in the company's words, "" The posting is dated August 6, 2026; the recall was initiated on July 13, 2026, according to the FDA. The FDA notice says the recall was issued because the heated wire connector (pigtail) at the Neptune humidifier may exhibit discoloration, melting, smoke, burning odor, or other signs of localized thermal damage. The agency lists the potential hazards as continued delivery of inadequately heated or unconditioned gas, which can desiccate and damage the airway epithelium and predispose an infant to bronchospasm, inspissated secretions and airway obstruction; increased circuit condensation, or rainout, which can cause inadvertent positive end-expiratory pressure, circuit obstruction, or accidental lavage of pooled fluid into the infant's airway; and reduced humidity and delivery of cold, dry gas, increasing the risk of cold stress, elevated oxygen consumption and worsening respiratory distress. The FDA says the affected products were distributed nationwide from June 28, 2021, to July 31, 2026, under the Medline and Teleflex brand names, and were manufactured on or before July 8, 2026. Identifying codes listed by the agency include HUD78001KIT, 780-01KIT, HUD78007, 780-07, HUD78007KIT, 780-07KIT, HUD78008KIT, 780-08KIT, HUD78009, 780-09, HUD78009KIT, 780-09KIT, HUD78013, 780-13, HUD78014, 780-14, HUD78015, 780-15, HUD78017KIT, 780-17KIT, HUD78018, 780-18, HUD78018KIT, 780-18KIT, HUD78019, 780-19, HUD88001KIT, 880-01KIT, HUD88013KIT, 880-13KIT, HUD88014KIT, 880-14KIT, HUD88015KIT, 880-15KIT, HUD88017KIT and 880-17KIT. The FDA notice says consumers who have the affected circuits should stop using and discard the device, and should not return the product to Medline.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 18 Aug 2026, 00:58current

    First published.

  2. Version 18 Aug 2026, 00:03current

    First published.

  3. Version 18 Aug 2026, 00:56current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble β€” all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources β€” accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements β€” and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld β€” a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them β€” and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.