FirstAlerts

FDA Expands Recall of Medline Convenience Kits Over Open Seal on BD ChloraPrep Applicators

The FDA has expanded a recall of Medline convenience kits to include additional codes, citing an open or incomplete seal on BD ChloraPrep Clear 1 mL applicators.

5 reports on this incident · first at Sep 1, 2026, 10:46 p.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Sep 1, 2026, 10:30 p.m. ETWritten Sep 1, 2026, 11:56 p.m. ET
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has expanded a recall of convenience kits that contain BD ChloraPrep Clear 1 mL applicators, according to an enforcement report published August 31, 2026. The recall, initiated July 20, 2026, now covers distributed . The reason for the recall is an on the applicator, which could lead to . The recall is classified as , the FDA's middle category, used where the product may cause temporary or medically reversible harm, and where the chance of serious harm is remote. The FDA enforcement report lists the recall number as and the status as . is the firm associated with the recall. Customers are instructed to request stickers to over-label affected kits with an instruction telling staff to remove the affected applicator and replace it from separate supply. No kits are to be returned. The FDA database records no other enforcement action by this firm, which says nothing about fault in this action.

Earlier reports

  1. Sep 1, 2026, 11:53 p.m. ET

    FDA Reclassifies Medline Convenience Kit Recall as Class II

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has reclassified the recall of Medline convenience kits containing BD ChloraPrep Clear 1 mL applicators as Class II, according to an FDA enforcement report published August 31, 2026. The recall, initiated July 20, 2026, covers 222,653 units distributed nationwide. The agency's Class II designation is its middle category, used where the product may cause temporary or medically reversible harm and where the chance of serious harm is remote, per the FDA's recall definitions.

    The recall was prompted by an open or incomplete seal on the applicators, which could lead to localized skin or soft tissue infection, or a systemic infection or infectious complication. The FDA recall records reviewed for this report do not report any injuries. The remedy instructs customers to request stickers to over-label affected kits with an instruction to remove the affected applicator and replace it from separate supply; no kits are to be returned. The recall status is open.

    The FDA database records no other enforcement action by this firm, according to the agency's enforcement records.

  2. Sep 1, 2026, 11:23 p.m. ET

    FDA Reports Injuries in Medline Convenience Kit Recall Over Open Seal on BD ChloraPrep Applicators

    The FDA's enforcement report for recall number 99561, dated 2026-08-31, now states that injuries have been reported in connection with the recall of Medline convenience kits containing BD ChloraPrep Clear 1 mL applicators. The agency's record does not specify the number or nature of the injuries, and it does not state that they are linked to the open or incomplete seal that prompted the recall.

    The recall, initiated on 2026-07-20, covers 222,653 units distributed nationwide. The FDA classifies it as Class II, its middle category, used where a product may cause temporary or medically reversible harm and where the chance of serious harm is remote. The hazard listed is localized skin or soft tissue infection, or a systemic infection or infectious complication.

    The remedy instructs customers to request stickers to over-label affected kits with an instruction to remove the affected applicator and replace it from separate supply; no kits are to be returned. The FDA's database records no other enforcement action by this firm.

  3. Sep 1, 2026, 10:52 p.m. ET

    FDA Closes Recall of Medline Convenience Kits Over Open Seal on BD ChloraPrep Applicators

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has closed the recall of Medline convenience kits containing BD ChloraPrep Clear 1 mL applicators, according to the agency's enforcement report. The closure means the FDA considers the recall carried out.

    The recall, initiated July 20, 2026, was classified as Class II, the FDA's middle category, used where the product may cause temporary or medically reversible harm and where the chance of serious harm is remote. The reason for the action was an open or incomplete seal on the applicators, which could lead to localized skin or soft tissue infection, or a systemic infection or infectious complication, as reported by Medical Daily.

    The FDA enforcement report, recall number 99561, lists 222,653 units distributed nationwide. The remedy instructed customers to request stickers to over-label affected kits with an instruction to remove the affected applicator and replace it from separate supply; no kits were to be returned. The FDA recall records reviewed for this report do not report any injuries.

    The agency's database records no other enforcement action by this firm. The recall status is now closed, according to the enforcement report.

  4. Sep 1, 2026, 10:46 p.m. ETFirst report

    Medline Recalls Convenience Kits Over Open Seal on BD ChloraPrep Applicators

    Medline has initiated a nationwide recall of convenience kits containing BD ChloraPrep Clear 1 mL applicators, according to a report from Medical Daily. The recall, initiated on July 20, 2026, and reported on August 31, 2026, affects 222,653 units. The reason for the recall is an open or incomplete seal on the applicator, which could lead to localized skin or soft tissue infection, or a systemic infection or infectious complication. The FDA recall records reviewed for this report do not report any injuries.

    The FDA has classified this as a Class II recall, the agency's middle category, used where the product may cause temporary or medically reversible harm, and where the chance of serious harm is remote. The recall number is 99561. The status of the recall is open.

    Customers are instructed to request stickers to over-label affected kits with an instruction telling staff to remove the affected applicator and replace it from separate supply. No kits are to be returned. The FDA enforcement report lists Medline as the firm, and the database records no other enforcement action by this firm.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 12 Sept 2026, 03:56current

    First published.

  2. Version 12 Sept 2026, 02:46current

    First published.

  3. Version 12 Sept 2026, 03:23current

    First published.

  4. Version 12 Sept 2026, 03:53current

    First published.

  5. Version 12 Sept 2026, 02:52current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.