FDA Reports Details on Ongoing Recall of Mellish Island Dietary Supplements
An FDA enforcement report published August 5, 2026, outlines an ongoing Class II recall of dietary supplements distributed by Mellish Island Corp.
4 reports on this incident · first at Aug 20, 2026, 1:39 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 20, 2026, 1:52 a.m. ET
FDA Classifies Mellish Island Dietary Supplement Recall as Class II
On August 5, 2026, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration classified the ongoing recall of Mellish Island Super Skin dietary supplements as a Class II action, according to an FDA enforcement report. The FDA defines Class II as its middle hazard category, used where a product may cause temporary or medically reversible health consequences, and where the probability of serious adverse health consequences is remote.
The recall, filed under recall number H-1190-2026, was initiated on July 1, 2026, by San Dimas-based Mellish Island Corp and remains ongoing. The action affects 1,600 bottles of Mellish Island Super Skin (60 Capsules, 2 per day) carrying UPC 8 58792 00332 3, lot code CA1G24, and expiration date 08-2027. The product was distributed exclusively through TikTok, presumably nationwide.
According to the FDA enforcement record, the recall was prompted because the finished product label fails to declare the source of marine collagen, which was determined to be fish. FDA database records list no other enforcement actions for Mellish Island Corp.
Aug 20, 2026, 1:44 a.m. ET
FDA Closes Recall of Mellish Island Super Skin Dietary Supplements
The Food and Drug Administration closed recall action H-1190-2026 on August 5, 2026, indicating the agency considers the recall carried out. The recall was originally initiated on July 1, 2026, by San Dimas-based Mellish Island Corp because the finished product label did not declare fish as the source of marine collagen.<br><br>For consumers holding remaining stock, the recalled product is Mellish Island Super Skin (Dietary Supplement; 60 Capsules, 2 per day) distributed by Mellish Island Corp with UPC 8 58792 00332 3. The specific identifying codes are Lot CA1G24 and Expiration 08-2027. Official records show 1,600 bottles were distributed exclusively through TikTok, presumably nationwide.<br><br>Official FDA records classified the recall as Class II. The FDA defines Class II as its middle category, used where the product may cause temporary or medically reversible harm, and where the chance of serious harm is remote. FDA database records list no other enforcement actions for Mellish Island Corp.
Aug 20, 2026, 1:39 a.m. ETFirst report
FDA Reports Recall of Mellish Island Dietary Supplements Over Undeclared Fish Allergen
On August 5, 2026, FDA enforcement records reported an ongoing recall of 1,600 bottles of dietary supplements distributed by San Dimas-based Mellish Island Corp. The recall was initiated on July 1, 2026, and the status remains open and developing.
The recall involves Mellish Island Super Skin, sold as a dietary supplement of 60 capsules with instructions for 2 per day, under UPC 8 58792 00332 3. Affected units bear lot code CA1G24 and an expiration date of 08-2027. According to FDA enforcement records, the firm's finished product label does not declare the source of marine collagen, which was determined to be fish. Distribution was exclusively through TikTok, presumably nationwide.
FDA enforcement records designate the event as a Class II recall under recall number H-1190-2026. The FDA defines Class II as a classification used where a product may cause temporary or medically reversible harm, and where the chance of serious harm is remote. Agency records list no other enforcement history for Mellish Island Corp.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 06:23current
First published.
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 05:39current
First published.
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 05:52current
First published.
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 05:44current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.