FirstAlerts
Recalls & Safety AlertsVersion 6

FDA Records Ongoing Class II Recall of Nutricia Nourish Berry Medley Formula Over Subpotent Vitamin A

An FDA enforcement report dated July 22, 2026 lists a recall initiated May 26, 2026 covering pouches shipped to 48 US jurisdictions, Canada and Australia.

By AI ReporterUpdated Aug 7, 2026, 10:20 a.m. ET
An FDA enforcement report, recall number , records an recall by of functional formularies NOURISH ORGANIC WHOLE FOODS MEAL REPLACEMENT PEPTIDE FORMULA BERRY MEDLEY COMPLETE PLANT BASED NUTRITION, net weight 12 OZ (341g), case UPC 8 57858 00445 8 and package UPC 8 57858 00447 2. The record gives the reason as "Subpotent for Vitamin A," stating that the firm discovered the testing laboratory used the wrong method when testing for vitamin A, and that the results gave a higher concentration of vitamin A than is actually in the product. The recall was initiated on May 26, 2026 and the report is dated July 22, 2026. The enforcement record lists the status as . The affected quantity is listed as 2,050cs/12/12oz pouches plus 55,310cs/24/12oz pouches. The identifying codes are given as 24-count cases with best-if-used-by dates up to and including April 14, 2028, and 12-count packages with best-if-used-by dates up to and including February 19, 2028. According to the enforcement report, the product was shipped to AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CO, CT, Washington DC, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, MS, MT, NC, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NM, NV, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI and WV, as well as to Canada and Australia. The FDA classified the action as . By the agency's own definition, is the middle category, used where a product may cause temporary or medically reversible harm and where the chance of serious harm is remote. The agency's enforcement database records four other actions by this firm: a recall also dated July 22, 2026 of functional formularies LIQUID HOPE ORGANIC WHOLE FOODS MEAL REPLACEMEN, for the same stated reason of subpotency for vitamin A tied to the testing laboratory's method; a recall dated November 15, 2023 of Nutricia KetcoCal 4:1 LQ Unflavored in 237ml (8fl oz) packaged in tetra for incorrect product in packaging; a recall dated June 28, 2023 of TYR Anamix Early Years infant formula, Net Wt. 14.1 oz (400g), for undeclared tyrosine; and a recall dated January 17, 2018 of SHS Wel-Plan Wheat and Corn Strach Baking Mix, 400 g box. Those prior actions are database context only and say nothing about fault in this recall.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 67 Aug 2026, 14:20current

    No new facts; headline and dek added to summarize the recall record, story text unchanged.

  2. Version 57 Aug 2026, 13:29

    No new facts in the record; headline and dek tightened, story otherwise unchanged.

  3. Version 47 Aug 2026, 08:53

    Added source URLs for the FDA enforcement record and the Class II definition, and restored fuller product/packaging wording from the record in the recall-history paragraph.

  4. Version 37 Aug 2026, 03:32

    Removed the paragraph describing the product from manufacturer pages, which was outside the verified fact set; restored the enforcement record's exact product and state-list wording.

  5. Version 26 Aug 2026, 23:14current

    Added a paragraph describing what the recalled product is and how it is sold, sourced to the manufacturer's product pages.

  6. Version 16 Aug 2026, 19:04

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.