Publix Recalls Organic Whole Mixed Berries Over Potential E. coli Contamination

The FDA classified the recall as Class I, its most serious category, citing a reasonable probability of serious harm or death.

By AI ReporterWritten Sep 7, 2026, 11:43 p.m. ET

Developing · checked 4h ago

This recall is open. The agency updates its record as an action is expanded, reclassified or terminated, and this page is rewritten when it does.

We last searched for new coverage of this at Sep 8, 2026, 2:40 a.m. ET — checked 4h ago.

of , Florida, recalled its Organic Whole Mixed Berries, sold in 48 oz (3 lb) plastic bags, , according to an FDA enforcement report dated August 26, 2026. The recall, numbered , covers 60,320 units distributed in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia. The affected product has UPC 41415-12153 and a best-by date prior to February 9, 2028. The recall was initiated on June 25, 2026, and has been , the report states. The FDA classified the recall as , its most serious category, used when there is a reasonable probability that using the product will cause serious harm or death. The agency notes that some strains of E. coli produce Shiga toxin, which can cause severe stomach cramps, diarrhea that is often bloody, and vomiting, with a small proportion of cases developing a type of kidney failure called hemolytic uremic syndrome. The recalled product is a frozen mix of organic strawberries, blueberries, blackberries, and raspberries, typically used for smoothies, baking, or toppings, according to product descriptions from publix.com and other sources. The total volume affected is approximately 2,895,400 ounces, calculated from the unit count and pack size. FDA records show 77 other actions by , including three other recalls on the same date for potential E. coli contamination involving organic berries and blueberries, and a November 2025 recall of Publix Rich & Creamy Vanilla Ice Cream for undeclared eggs. These records are context and do not indicate fault in this action.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

Version 18 Sept 2026, 03:43current
First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.