FDA Closes Recall of Outshine Grape Fruit Bars Over Possible Glass Pieces
The FDA has closed the recall of Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream's Outshine Grape Fruit Bars, originally initiated over possible glass contamination.
2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 7, 2026, 11:22 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 7, 2026, 11:22 p.m. ETFirst report
Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream Recalls Outshine Grape Fruit Bars Over Possible Glass Pieces
Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream Inc. of Laurel, Maryland, is recalling Outshine Fruit Bars Grape, 6-Count 2.5 ounce, because the products may contain glass pieces, according to an FDA enforcement report dated September 2, 2026. The recall, initiated August 18, 2026, covers 281 pallets with UPC 041548244044. The FDA has classified this as a Class II recall, meaning the product may cause temporary or medically reversible harm and the chance of serious harm is remote.
The product was distributed to Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, North Dakota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Virgin Islands, Washington, and Wisconsin. The recall is ongoing.
According to the FDA's recall database, Dreyer's has had seven other actions in 2026 involving Outshine fruit bars, all Class II and all citing possible glass pieces. These include Watermelon, Strawberry, Black Cherry, and a 24-count variety pack. This history is provided for context and does not indicate fault in this specific recall.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 18 Sept 2026, 03:22current
First published.
- Version 18 Sept 2026, 03:23current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.