FDA Enforcement Action Closed for Peter Rabbit Organics Fruit Puree Pouches
The FDA has closed its recall action for select Peter Rabbit Organics fruit puree pouches affected by possible foreign plastic strands.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 19, 2026, 6:10 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 19, 2026, 6:10 p.m. ETFirst report
FDA Reports Ongoing Recall of Peter Rabbit Organics Banana & Strawberry Puree Pouches
On August 12, 2026, the FDA reported an ongoing recall initiated on July 13, 2026, by PT Organics Limited of Lake Oswego, Oregon, for Pumpkin Tree Peter Rabbit Organics Banana & Strawberry fruit puree. The stated reason is a possible foreign object (thin, soft plastic strands). The recall covers 4,385 (4-oz units) of defective pouches from total lot produced and is filed under recall number H-1223-2026. The FDA classified the recall as Class II.
The affected product is a pasteurized blend of banana and strawberry purees sold in a single-serve spouted flexible film pouch (4oz/113g) with a red cap, intended for consumption by children aged +6 months. It carries UPC 815367010780 and PTO Item 10720. Each master case contains 10/4oz. pouches of PT Organics Banana Strawberry 1006034, and the bar code on the master case label is 00815367010797. The product is listed as distributed by PT Organics Ltd, 333 South State St, Suite V-142, Lake Oswego, OR 97034.
The pouches were distributed in AL, AZ, CA, CO, GA, IA, IL, IN, KS, MI, MN, NC, NJ, NY, OH, OR, PA, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA, and WI.
The recall status is listed as ongoing as of the August 12, 2026, report date. The enforcement record as reported does not include product disposition or consumer return instructions.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- https://api.fda.gov/food/enforcement.json?search=recall_number:%22H-1223-2026%22
- https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/pt-organics-limited-recalls-select-pumpkin-tree-peter-rabbit-organics-banana-strawberry-fruit-puree
- https://www.fda.gov/safety/industry-guidance-recalls/recalls-background-and-definitions
Revision history
- Version 119 Aug 2026, 22:10current
First published.
- Version 119 Aug 2026, 22:27current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.