FDA Closes Recall Action for Unlabeled Soft Ricotta Cheese in New York
The FDA considers the recall carried out for Nelson & Isa Lacteos LLC soft ricotta cheese.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 20, 2026, 1:24 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 20, 2026, 1:24 a.m. ETFirst report
FDA Reports Class I Recall of Unlabeled Soft Ricotta Cheese in New York
On August 5, 2026, official FDA enforcement records reported an ongoing Class I recall initiated on June 5, 2026, by Nelson & Isa Lacteos LLC of Bay Shore for 480 1-lb clamshell packages of soft ricotta cheese. The recall, registered under recall number H-1189-2026, involves product distributed only in NY due to potential contamination with Listeria monocytogenes.
The product is described in official records as Requeson (soft ricotta) 1 lb. packed into a clear clamshell package with no labeling information, with "Requeson" handwritten in black marker on the top lid of the clamshell package. The product has no lot code or UPC.
According to FDA definitions, Class I is the agency's most serious category, used where there is a reasonable probability that using the product will cause serious harm or death. The FDA states that Listeria monocytogenes causes listeriosis, which can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people and others with weakened immune systems, and that infection in pregnant women can cause miscarriage and stillbirth.
FDA database records show no other enforcement action for Nelson & Isa Lacteos LLC. Agency records list 569 food recalls citing Listeria monocytogenes over the last 2 years. The status of this recall remains ongoing.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 05:24current
First published.
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 05:53current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.