FirstAlerts
Recalls & Safety Alerts

FSIS Classifies Shanghai Ravioli Buffalo Chicken Recall as Class I

The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service has classified a recall of roughly 24,900 pounds of frozen buffalo chicken products as Class I, citing a risk to consumer health.

3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 26, 2026, 9:04 p.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 26, 2026, 8:54 p.m. ETWritten Aug 27, 2026, 10:20 p.m. ET
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service () has classified a recall of from as . The agency said the products may contain undeclared allergens, harmful bacteria, or other contaminants that put consumer health and safety at risk. The recall covers of product. The products include BUFFALO CHICKEN RANGOON and BENEDETTO'S BUFFALO CHICKEN MOZZARELLA STICK, with sell-by dates from July 8, 2026, to June 29, 2027, and establishment number "EST. 18004." said the products were .

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 27, 2026, 1:05 a.m. ET

    Shanghai Ravioli Corporation Expands Recall of Buffalo Chicken Products Over Lack of Inspection

    Shanghai Ravioli Corporation has expanded its recall of frozen buffalo chicken products because they were produced without the benefit of inspection, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), as reported by Fox Business and Food Safety News. The recall covers about 24,900 pounds of product.

    The affected products are sold under the brand names BUFFALO CHICKEN RANGOON and BENEDETTO'S BUFFALO CHICKEN MOZZARELLA STICK. They are frozen, not-ready-to-eat (NRTE) buffalo chicken products, according to Food Safety News, or frozen, not-ready-to-eat Buffalo chicken products, according to Fox Business. The products carry sell-by dates from July 8, 2026, to June 29, 2027, and bear establishment number "EST. 18004," as reported by Fox Business.

    The products were distributed to foodservice locations in Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont, according to both Fox Business and Food Safety News. Foodservice locations that have purchased these products are instructed not to serve them, and the products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase, according to Fox Business. Food Safety News reports that foodservice locations are urged not to serve them and that the products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase.

    There have been no confirmed reports of illness or injury linked to the consumption of these products, according to both Fox Business and Food Safety News. The recall was reported on August 26, 2026, according to Food Safety News, and on August 27, 2026, according to Fox Business.

  2. Aug 26, 2026, 9:04 p.m. ETFirst report

    Shanghai Ravioli Corporation Recalls Buffalo Chicken Products Over Lack of Inspection

    Shanghai Ravioli Corporation has recalled approximately 24,900 pounds of frozen, not-ready-to-eat buffalo chicken products, according to a recall notice reported by Food Safety News. The products were distributed to foodservice locations in Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

    The recall covers products labeled as BUFFALO CHICKEN RANGOON and BENEDETTO'S BUFFALO CHICKEN MOZZARELLA STICK. The reason for the recall is that the food was produced without the benefit of inspection, which may put consumer health at risk due to undeclared allergens, harmful bacteria, or other contaminants.

    Foodservice locations that have purchased these products are urged not to serve them and should throw them away or return them to the place of purchase. There have been no confirmed reports of illness or injury due to consumption of these products.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 429 Aug 2026, 07:40

    Updated to reflect the published status and ensure all figures and attributions match the fact set.

  2. Version 127 Aug 2026, 05:05current

    First published.

  3. Version 127 Aug 2026, 01:04current

    First published.

  4. Version 131 Aug 2026, 12:31

    First published.

  5. Version 128 Aug 2026, 02:20current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.