FDA Lists Class I Nationwide Recall of Two TNVitamins Moringa Products Over Salmonella
An FDA enforcement report records 8,492 units of moringa capsules and powder distributed by Total Nutrition Inc as contaminated with Salmonella, in an action the agency lists as ongoing.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- https://api.fda.gov/food/enforcement.json?search=recall_number:%22H-1185-2026%22
- https://www.fda.gov/safety/industry-guidance-recalls/recalls-background-and-definitions
- https://www.fda.gov/food/foodborne-pathogens/salmonella-salmonellosis
- https://www.britannica.com/plant/horseradish-tree
- https://winrock.org/moringa-oleifera-a-perfect-tree-for-home-gardens/
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10869624/
- https://sarep.ucdavis.edu/fs/moringa
Revision history
- Version 67 Aug 2026, 13:43current
No new facts; text unchanged apart from adding a headline and standfirst summarising the recall record.
- Version 57 Aug 2026, 10:21
Replaced the product-background paragraph's unsupported LiverTox and Dietary Supplement Label Database references with the botanical and manufacturing detail from the supplied Britannica, Winrock, PMC and UC SAREP sources.
- Version 47 Aug 2026, 06:31
Corrected the product-background attribution to Britannica and NIH sources (removing an unsupported Winrock International citation) and added the NIH label-database detail on retail forms.
- Version 37 Aug 2026, 00:55
Replaced the plant-database description of moringa with one attributed to Britannica and Winrock International, removed metric height and cultivation details, and added those source links.
- Version 26 Aug 2026, 20:20
Replaced the unsourced Britannica/Winrock plant description with the Plants For A Future entry and corrected the product-format details to match the reference data.
- Version 16 Aug 2026, 15:41
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.