FirstAlerts

Whole Foods Market Recalls 43 Products Over Salmonella Concerns

The FDA recall record, dated August 12, 2026, is listed as ongoing and identifies affected products by best-before and best-by dates ranging from August 7 to August 16, 2026.

3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 16, 2026, 2:26 p.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 13, 2026, 11:44 a.m. ETWritten Aug 16, 2026, 5:53 p.m. ET
is recalling over , according to a recall record filed with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and dated August 12, 2026. The recalling firm is listed as , and the affected products carry the brand name. The FDA lists the status of the recall as . The record identifies the affected products by **best-before and best-by dates ranging from August 7 to August 16, 2026**. Buyers checking their purchases should compare those dates against the packages they have on hand. Several pieces of information a shopper would want are not specified in the recall record as it stands. It does not name the individual products or product categories covered by the recall. It does not say where the products were distributed or sold. It does not state what remedy — refund, replacement, disposal instructions or otherwise — is being offered to people who bought them. It does not state whether any illnesses have been reported in connection with the products, and it does not include a hazard description beyond the stated reason for the recall: concerns that the products may be contaminated with salmonella. Because the recall is listed as , those details may be added or revised. This story will be updated if the FDA record is expanded to include them.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 16, 2026, 5:27 p.m. ET

    Whole Foods Market Recalls 43 Products Over Salmonella Concerns

    Whole Foods Market has recalled 43 products over concerns that they may be contaminated with salmonella, according to the FDA recall record. The record carries a report date of 2026-08-12 and lists the recall's status as ongoing.

    The only identifier the record gives for the affected items is date coding: best-before and best-by dates ranging from August 7 to August 16, 2026. Whole Foods Market is named as the brand and as the recalling firm, and the FDA as the agency.

    Beyond that, the record is thin, and the gaps bear directly on anyone trying to work out whether an affected product is in their kitchen. It carries no product description, so none of the 43 items is named or described. It carries no distribution information, so the states, stores and online channels the products reached are not specified on the record. It states no hazard classification — the ranking the agency uses to register how serious a hazard it considers a recalled product to pose — so the severity the FDA itself attaches to these products is not on the record.

    The record also says nothing about illnesses. It carries no entry for injuries reported, which is not the same thing as a statement that no one has been made ill; on this record the question is simply unanswered.

    It states no remedy either. There is no instruction on the record about whether to consume, discard or return the affected products, and no refund terms.

    What the record does state plainly is the reason for the action: concerns that the 43 products may be contaminated with salmonella. The recall remains ongoing as of the 2026-08-12 report date, and the August 7 to August 16, 2026 date range is the only identifier attached to it.

  2. Aug 16, 2026, 2:26 p.m. ETFirst report

    Whole Foods Market Recalls 43 Products Over Salmonella Concerns

    Whole Foods Market has recalled 43 products over concerns that they may be contaminated with salmonella. The recall was reported on August 12, 2026, and its status is ongoing.

    The affected items are identified by best-before and best-by dates ranging from August 7 to August 16, 2026. The agency listed for the recall is the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Whole Foods Market is both the recalling firm and the brand name on the affected products.

    What the recall record does not yet say

    Several details that consumers would normally look for are not specified in the recall record as it currently stands:

    • Which products are affected. No product description accompanies the count of 43 products.
    • Where the products were sold. No distribution area or list of states is specified.
    • Whether anyone has been sickened. The record does not state whether any illnesses have been reported in connection with the products.
    • What consumers should do. No remedy — refund, replacement, return or disposal instruction — is specified.
    • The hazard classification. Beyond the stated concern about possible salmonella contamination, no hazard designation is given.

    Because the recall is ongoing, these details may be added or revised. Consumers holding Whole Foods Market products with best-before or best-by dates in the August 7 to August 16, 2026 range should watch for further notices from the company or the FDA.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 116 Aug 2026, 21:53current

    First published.

  2. Version 116 Aug 2026, 18:26current

    First published.

  3. Version 116 Aug 2026, 21:27current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.