FDA Reports Closure of Whole Foods Mild Guacamole Dip Recall Over Salmonella Risk
The FDA's August 26, 2026, enforcement report lists the Class I recall of Whole Foods Mild Guacamole Dip No Tomatoes as closed, following possible Salmonella contamination.
2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 7, 2026, 7:17 p.m. ET
This recall is open. The agency updates its record as an action is expanded, reclassified or terminated, and this page is rewritten when it does.
We have not yet searched for new coverage of this beyond the reports listed below.
Earlier reports
Sep 7, 2026, 7:17 p.m. ETFirst report
Whole Foods Mild Guacamole Dip Recalled Over Possible Salmonella Contamination
WFM Purchasing, LP of Austin, Texas, has initiated a recall of Whole Foods Mild Guacamole Dip No Tomatoes, Keep Refrigerated, according to an FDA enforcement report dated August 26, 2026. The recall, numbered H-1247-2026, covers approximately 12,995 units distributed in AR, IA, IL, IN, KY, LA, MI, MN, MO, OH, OK, TX, and WI. The product is packed in various sized clear plastic containers with a finished product label, and includes PLU codes 24293900000, 25745000000, 24367500000, and 25658600000. The affected items have Best Before/By Dates of 8/7/2026 through 8/12/2026.
The recall was initiated on August 7, 2026, and is ongoing. The FDA has classified it as Class I, the agency's most serious category, indicating a reasonable probability that use of the product could cause serious harm or death. The reason for the recall is that the salsa and guacamole products were made with jalapenos that may be contaminated with Salmonella. According to the FDA, Salmonella can cause diarrhoea, fever, and abdominal cramps, typically within 12 to 72 hours after infection, with illness lasting four to seven days. In some cases, hospitalization may be required, with young children, older adults, and people with weakened immune systems at greatest risk.
The FDA enforcement report lists 13 other actions by this firm, all dated August 26, 2026, involving similar guacamole products with the same potential contamination issue. These actions are part of the public record and do not indicate fault in this specific recall. Consumers who have purchased the affected product should check the Best Before/By Dates and PLU codes to determine if their product is included in the recall.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 17 Sept 2026, 23:17current
First published.
- Version 17 Sept 2026, 23:23current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.