Expanded Recall Announced for Winston Porter and Seeday Dressers
A Consumer Product Safety Commission notice details an expanded recall of Winston Porter and Seeday dressers over tip-over and entrapment hazards.
3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 20, 2026, 12:23 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 20, 2026, 12:24 a.m. ET
CPSC Reports Child Injury in Winston Porter and Seeday Dresser Tip-Over Incident
On August 6, 2026, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) reported one tip-over incident involving a dresser that resulted in the injury of a 3-year-old child. The report relates to recalled Winston Porter and Seeday 3-Drawer, 4-Drawer, and 5-Drawer dressers, which pose tip-over and entrapment hazards if not anchored to a wall and violate mandatory safety standards required by the STURDY Act. According to the official CPSC recall notice, the recall affects about 2,000 5-Drawer Dressers, 28 3-Drawer Dressers, and 22 4-Drawer Dressers from Linyi Lingmoxuan Technology Co., Ltd., of China and Shenzhen Xinmu Home Furnishing Trading Co., Ltd., dba Seeday, of China. The wooden dressers feature a white or black finish with two black metal knobs per drawer. Packaging model numbers include DG-PB-0007 (white) or DG-PB-0013 (black) for 3-Drawer dressers measuring 16.3 inches long, 30 inches wide, and 33.5 inches tall; DG-PB-0015 (white) or DG-PB-0016 (black) for 4-Drawer dressers measuring 16.3 inches long, 29.5 inches wide, and 34.6 inches tall; and DG-PB-0008 (white) or DG-PB-0014 (black) for 5-Drawer dressers measuring 16.3 inches long, 30 inches wide, and 42 inches tall. The CPSC notice instructs consumers to stop using unanchored dressers immediately and place them in an area children cannot access. Consumers should contact Linyi Lingmoxuan and Seeday for instructions on identifying affected units and disposing of them to obtain a full refund. Consumers will be required to write 'recalled' on the top and all sides with a permanent marker and email a photo demonstrating product disposal to Winstonporterseedayrecall@outlook.com. Agency database records show no other enforcement actions involving these firms.
Aug 20, 2026, 12:23 a.m. ETFirst report
CPSC Recalls Winston Porter and Seeday Dressers Due to Tip-Over and Entrapment Hazards
On August 6, 2026, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced a recall for Winston Porter and Seeday 3-Drawer, 4-Drawer and 5-Drawer Dressers under recall number 26663. The recalled dressers are unstable if not anchored to the wall, posing tip-over and entrapment hazards that violate the mandatory safety standard required by the STURDY Act. The CPSC noted that this is an open, developing action.
According to CPSC records, the recall involves about 2,000 5-Drawer Dressers, 28 3-Drawer Dressers and 22 4-Drawer Dressers sold by Linyi Lingmoxuan Technology Co., Ltd., of China and Shenzhen Xinmu Home Furnishing Trading Co., Ltd., dba Seeday, of China. The agency reported one incident where a dresser tipped over, resulting in the injury of a 3-year-old child. CPSC database records list no other enforcement actions for these firms.
The dressers are constructed of wood with a white or black finish, and each drawer features two black metal knobs. The specific models and dimensions listed in the CPSC notice include:
- 3-Drawer Dressers: Measure 16.3 inches long, 30 inches wide, and 33.5 inches tall. Packaging lists model numbers DG-PB-0007 (white) or DG-PB-0013 (black).
- 4-Drawer Dressers: Measure 16.3 inches long, 29.5 inches wide, and 34.6 inches tall. Packaging lists model numbers DG-PB-0015 (white) or DG-PB-0016 (black).
- 5-Drawer Dressers: Measure 16.3 inches long, 30 inches wide, and 42 inches tall. Packaging lists model numbers DG-PB-0008 (white) or DG-PB-0014 (black).
The CPSC states that consumers should immediately stop using any recalled dressers that are not anchored to the wall and move them to an area inaccessible to children. Consumers should contact Linyi Lingmoxuan and Seeday for instructions on how to identify affected units and dispose of them to receive a full refund. Consumers will be instructed to write the word "recalled" on the top and all sides of the dresser with a permanent marker and email a photo demonstrating disposal to Winstonporterseedayrecall@outlook.com.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 04:34current
First published.
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 04:23current
First published.
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 04:24current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.