Truststone Group Recalls XO Poppy Power Banks Over Fire Hazard
About 32,400 magnetic wireless power banks sold at TJX and Marshalls are recalled due to fire and burn hazards.
3 reports on this incident · first at Sep 3, 2026, 10:41 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 3, 2026, 10:57 a.m. ET
Truststone Group Expands Recall of XO Poppy Power Banks Due to Fire and Burn Hazard
Truststone Group has expanded its recall of XO Poppy Power Trip Magnetic Wireless Power Banks, according to a notice from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) dated September 3, 2026. The recall now includes additional model numbers beyond those previously announced. Consumers should stop using the recalled power banks immediately and contact Truststone Group for a full refund in the form of a virtual gift card usable anywhere Mastercard is accepted.
The recalled power banks have model number PYPBK5M and come in three colors: cream (PY-PBK5M-CR2), cream with pink bow print (PY-PBK5M-BW8), and black with teddy bear print (PY-PBK5M-TB2). The model number is printed on the bottom of the original packaging, directly above the barcode. The lithium-ion battery can overheat and ignite, posing fire and burn hazards. No injuries have been reported. About 32,400 units are affected.
The recall was initiated on September 3, 2026, and carries recall number 26740. The CPSC notice states the power banks were sold exclusively at TJX and Marshalls stores. The CPSC database records no other enforcement action by this firm.
Sep 3, 2026, 10:41 a.m. ETFirst report
Truststone Group Recalls XO Poppy Power Banks Over Fire and Burn Hazard
Truststone Group is recalling about 32,400 XO Poppy Power Trip Magnetic Wireless Power Banks, model number PYPBK5M, because the lithium-ion battery can overheat and ignite, posing fire and burn hazards, according to a recall notice from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) dated September 3, 2026. No injuries have been reported.
The recalled power banks come in three colors: cream (PY-PBK5M-CR2), cream with pink bow print (PY-PBK5M-BW8), and black with teddy bear print (PY-PBK5M-TB2). Model numbers are printed on the bottom of the original packaging above the barcode. They were sold exclusively at TJX and Marshalls stores.
Consumers should stop using the recalled power banks immediately and contact Truststone Group for a full refund in the form of a virtual gift card usable anywhere Mastercard is accepted. The CPSC recall number is 26740. The CPSC database records no other enforcement action by Truststone Group.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- Power Banks Sold at TJX and Marshalls Stores Are Recalled Because Their Lithium Batteries Can Overheat and Ignitemedicaldaily.com
- https://cpsc.gov/Recalls/2026/Truststone-Group-Recalls-XO-Poppy-Power-Trip-Magnetic-Wireless-Power-Banks-Due-to-Fire-and-Burn-Hazards-Sold-Exclusively-at-TJX-and-Marshalls-Stores
Revision history
- Version 25 Sept 2026, 01:47current
Updated to include CPSC recall notice as primary source and added context about no other enforcement actions.
- Version 13 Sept 2026, 14:57current
First published.
- Version 13 Sept 2026, 14:41current
First published.
- Version 13 Sept 2026, 14:55
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.