CPSC Expands Recall of YERYORK Pressure Washers Over Shock Hazard
The recall now includes additional units of YERYORK pressure washers lacking a ground-fault circuit-interrupter, posing shock and electrocution risks.
3 reports on this incident · first at Sep 3, 2026, 2:38 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 3, 2026, 2:53 p.m. ET
CPSC Reports Injuries in YERYORK Pressure Washer Recall
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has reported injuries in connection with the recall of YERYORK pressure washers, model YE-006, announced August 27, 2026. The agency's recall notice states that injuries have been reported, though it does not specify the number or nature of the injuries.
The recalled 2.5 GPM electric pressure washers are green and black, measure about 10.24 inches deep, 16.14 inches wide, and 12.01 inches high, and come with a 500 ml foam cannon, four quick disconnect nozzles, a 32.81-foot hose, and four lockable wheels. Only units without a ground-fault circuit-interrupter (GFCI) are included. The brand is printed on the front and the model number YE-006 appears on a label near the handle.
The CPSC says the lack of an integral GFCI and an adequate-length power cord poses serious risks of injury or death from shock and electrocution. Consumers should stop using the recalled pressure washers immediately and contact YERYORK for a full refund. They will be asked to unplug the unit, cut the power cord in half, and send a photo showing the model number to yeryorkrecalls@outlook.com, then dispose of the destroyed product.
About 300 units were sold on Amazon by YERYORK. No other enforcement actions by this firm are recorded in the CPSC database.
Sep 3, 2026, 2:38 p.m. ETFirst report
YERYORK Pressure Washers Recalled Over Shock and Electrocution Hazards
On August 27, 2026, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced a recall of YERYORK-branded electric pressure washers, model number YE-006, due to the lack of an integral ground-fault circuit-interrupter (GFCI) and an adequate-length power cord, posing serious risks of injury or death from shock and electrocution hazards. The recall notice, number 26725, states that no injuries have been reported.
The recalled pressure washers are green with black, measure about 10.24 inches deep, 16.14 inches wide, and 12.01 inches high, and come with a 500 ml foam cannon, four quick disconnect nozzles, a 32.81-foot hose, and four lockable wheels. Only units without a GFCI are included. The brand is printed on the front and the model number on a label near the handle. Approximately 300 units were sold on Amazon by YERYORK.
Consumers should stop using the recalled pressure washers immediately and contact YERYORK for a full refund. They will be asked to unplug the unit, cut the power cord in half, and send a photo of the destroyed unit showing the model number to yeryorkrecalls@outlook.com, then dispose of the product. The CPSC database records no other enforcement action by this firm.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 13 Sept 2026, 18:54current
First published.
- Version 13 Sept 2026, 18:38current
First published.
- Version 13 Sept 2026, 18:53current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.