Medicare Health Advisors Loses Summary Judgment Bid in TCPA Class Action
A federal court denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment, rejecting unauthenticated lead records as hearsay.
2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 8, 2026, 2:53 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 8, 2026, 2:53 p.m. ETFirst report
Court Denies Summary Judgment in TCPA Class Action Over Unauthenticated Lead Records
A federal district court denied Medicare Health Advisors' motion for summary judgment in a TCPA class action, according to a report by the National Law Review. The plaintiff alleged she received prerecorded calls from the defendant without consent. The case is at the contested stage in district court.
The court rejected the defendant's reliance on unauthenticated Jornaya lead records, finding them inadmissible as hearsay. The case is identified by reference 2026 WL 2622653.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 18 Sept 2026, 19:23current
First published.
- Version 18 Sept 2026, 18:53current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.