Judge Orders Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios to Pay Lively $407,000 in Fees and Costs
A federal judge awarded Blake Lively about $400,000 in attorneys' fees and costs in the dismissed lawsuit brought by Justin Baldoni and his production company.
4 reports on this incident · first at Aug 26, 2026, 1:51 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 1, 2026, 6:20 p.m. ET
Blake Lively Awarded Legal Fees in Settled Baldoni Dispute
A court has ordered Justin Baldoni's production company to pay Blake Lively about $400,000 in attorneys' fees and costs, according to conflicting reports from NBC News and the National Law Review. The order follows the resolution of a civil dispute between Lively and Baldoni, who directed the 2024 movie "It Ends With Us." Lively had accused Baldoni of sexual harassment and retaliation, while Baldoni and others brought a defamation claim against her. The matter has been settled, according to the National Law Review.
The National Law Review reports that the court ordered plaintiffs to pay Lively $407,000 in fees and costs under California Civil Code section 47.1, while NBC News reports the judge awarded Lively about $400,000 in attorneys' fees from Baldoni's production company. The conflicting figures are reported as between about $400,000 and $407,000. The court's order was issued after the case was dismissed, according to NBC News.
Aug 26, 2026, 1:52 p.m. ET
Judge Awards Blake Lively About $400,000 in Legal Fees in Dismissed Baldoni Lawsuit
A judge has awarded Blake Lively about $400,000 in attorneys' fees and costs from Justin Baldoni's production company, Wayfarer Studios, according to NBC News. The award includes $363,245.40 in attorneys' fees and $44,206.35 in costs, as reported by NBC News.
The fees stem from Lively's civil lawsuit against Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios, in which she alleged sexual harassment during the production of the 2024 movie "It Ends With Us" and retaliation after she complained about misconduct on set. The lawsuit was dismissed, and the judge has now ordered the production company to cover Lively's legal expenses.
The exact nature of the award—whether it is a penalty, disgorgement, or redress—was not specified in the reporting.
Aug 26, 2026, 1:51 p.m. ETFirst report
Judge Awards Blake Lively About $400,000 in Legal Fees in Dismissed Baldoni Lawsuit
A judge has awarded Blake Lively about $400,000 in attorneys' fees from Justin Baldoni's production company, according to NBC News. The award includes $363,245.40 in attorneys' fees and $44,206.35 in costs, as reported by NBC News.
The fees stem from a civil case in which Lively accused Baldoni of sexual harassment during the production of the 2024 movie "It Ends With Us," which he directed. Lively also alleged that Baldoni's company, Wayfarer Studios, retaliated against her after she complained about misconduct on set, according to NBC News.
The case was adjudicated with the defendants found liable, and the judge's award was issued in a litigation release. The case is ongoing, and further developments may follow.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 11 Sept 2026, 22:24current
First published.
- Version 126 Aug 2026, 17:51current
First published.
- Version 126 Aug 2026, 17:52current
First published.
- Version 11 Sept 2026, 22:20current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.