FirstAlerts

More than 114,000 Britax car seats recalled over loose screw concern

NHTSA notice says a screw can come loose, causing the handle to become partially detached.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 29, 2026, 2:54 p.m. ETWritten Aug 29, 2026, 3:07 p.m. ET
More than 114,000 Britax car seats are under recall, according to a from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration () as reported by knopnews2.com. The recall follows complaints regarding a screw that can come loose, causing the handle to become partially detached. The , reported by knopnews2.com, lists Britax as the respondent. The specific models and production dates have not been detailed in the available information. The cause of the issue has not been determined, and the recall is ongoing. Consumers are advised to check for further information from or Britax.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 129 Aug 2026, 19:07current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.