NBA Fines Clippers $30 Million, Leonard $700,000 for Salary Cap Violations
The league penalized the Los Angeles Clippers and Kawhi Leonard for violating salary cap circumvention rules, according to multiple reports.
2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 2, 2026, 5:07 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 2, 2026, 5:07 p.m. ETFirst report
NBA Fines Clippers $30 Million, Kawhi Leonard $700,000 for Salary Cap Violations
The NBA fined the Los Angeles Clippers $30 million and star player Kawhi Leonard $700,000 on Wednesday for violating salary cap circumvention rules, according to NBC Miami. The penalties were announced in a Notice from the league.
The action also names team owner Steve Ballmer, president of basketball operations Lawrence Frank, and team president Gillian Zucker as respondents, per the report. The league determined the team and Leonard were liable for the violations.
The investigation remains open, and further details have not been disclosed.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- NBA fines Clippers $30M, penalizes Kawhi Leonard and more after investigationnbcmiami.com
- NBA suspends Clippers owner for a year, docks team first-round draft picks from Kawhi Leonard probenbcnews.com
- NBA announces fines, punishments for LA Clippers after Kawhi Leonard cap circumvention probeabc11.com
- NBA hits Clippers with massive punishment after Kawhi Leonard scandal Fillednewsweek.com
Revision history
- Version 22 Sept 2026, 22:22current
Added date of announcement, clarified conflicting reports on case stage and document type, and expanded details from sources.
- Version 12 Sept 2026, 21:53
First published.
- Version 12 Sept 2026, 21:07current
First published.
- Version 12 Sept 2026, 21:23
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.