Thirty Madison Consents to $400,000 Settlement with New York Attorney General
The company agreed to pay $400,000 and provide refunds and restitution to resolve allegations over subscription disclosures and cancellation practices.
4 reports on this incident · first at Aug 30, 2026, 7:10 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 30, 2026, 7:23 p.m. ET
New York Attorney General Secures $400,000 Settlement from Thirty Madison
New York Attorney General Letitia James has secured a settlement with Thirty Madison, Inc., an online medication provider, resolving allegations that the company misled consumers about its subscription terms and cancellation process, according to the National Law Review.
Under the settlement, Thirty Madison will pay $400,000 to the state and provide refunds and restitution to eligible subscribers and consumers. The company consented to the settlement without admitting wrongdoing, as the allegations were not proven in court.
The Attorney General's office alleged that Thirty Madison failed to clearly disclose its subscription terms and non-refundable fees, and failed to provide a simple cancellation process. The settlement resolves these allegations.
Aug 30, 2026, 7:15 p.m. ET
New York Attorney General Secures $400,000 Settlement from Thirty Madison
New York Attorney General Letitia James has secured a settlement with Thirty Madison, Inc., an online medication provider, over allegations that the company failed to clearly disclose its subscription terms and non-refundable fees, and failed to provide a simple cancellation process, according to the National Law Review.
Under the settlement, Thirty Madison will pay $400,000 to the state, and will provide refunds to eligible subscribers and restitution to eligible consumers. The company consented to the settlement without admitting wrongdoing.
The settlement resolves allegations that the company misled and deceived customers. The Attorney General's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Aug 30, 2026, 7:10 p.m. ETFirst report
New York Attorney General Secures $400,000 Settlement from Online Medication Provider Thirty Madison
The New York Attorney General has secured a settlement with Thirty Madison, Inc., an online medication provider, over allegations that the company failed to clearly disclose its subscription terms and non-refundable fees, and did not provide a simple cancellation process, according to the National Law Review.
Under the settlement, Thirty Madison will pay $400,000 to the state and provide refunds to eligible subscribers and restitution to eligible consumers. The company consented to the settlement, which resolves the allegations without a finding of liability.
The case is ongoing as the settlement is implemented.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 130 Aug 2026, 23:53current
First published.
- Version 130 Aug 2026, 23:10current
First published.
- Version 130 Aug 2026, 23:15current
First published.
- Version 130 Aug 2026, 23:23current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.