OFCCP Final Rule Rescinding Executive Order 11246 Regulations Takes Effect October 26, 2026
The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs published a final rule rescinding regulations implementing Executive Order 11246, effective October 26, 2026.
3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 21, 2026, 5:45 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 21, 2026, 5:51 p.m. ET
OFCCP Final Rule Rescinding Executive Order 11246 Regulations Takes Effect October 26, 2026
The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) has published a final rule rescinding regulations that implement Executive Order 11246, according to a report by the National Law Review. The rule takes effect on October 26, 2026.
The final rule, an administrative action, was reported by the National Law Review. No further details were provided in the report.
Aug 21, 2026, 5:45 p.m. ETFirst report
OFCCP Final Rule Rescinds Executive Order 11246 Regulations
The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) has published a final rule rescinding regulations that implement Executive Order 11246, according to a report by the National Law Review. The rule takes effect on October 26, 2026.
The action, described as an administrative final rule, was reported by the National Law Review. Further details about the scope or rationale of the rescission were not provided in the report.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- Beltway Buzz, August 21, 2026natlawreview.com
Revision history
- Version 121 Aug 2026, 21:52current
First published.
- Version 121 Aug 2026, 21:51current
First published.
- Version 121 Aug 2026, 21:45current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.