FirstAlerts

TSA Launches Gateside by TSA PreCheck Pilot at 13 Airports

The Transportation Security Administration has begun a pilot program allowing approved non-ticketed visitors to pass through security at 13 U.S. airports.

2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 6, 2026, 6:46 a.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Sep 6, 2026, 6:38 a.m. ETWritten Sep 6, 2026, 6:53 a.m. ET
The Transportation Security Administration has launched the Gateside by TSA PreCheck pilot program, which allows approved non-ticketed visitors to pass through security at 13 U.S. airports, according to Newsweek. The program was announced in a , as reported by Newsweek. The agency had previously proposed the rule for the pilot. Further details, including which airports are participating and how visitors can apply, have not been reported in the available coverage.

Earlier reports

  1. Sep 6, 2026, 6:46 a.m. ETFirst report

    TSA Proposes Pilot Program Allowing Non-Ticketed Visitors Through Security at 13 Airports

    The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has launched a pilot program called Gateside by TSA PreCheck that would allow approved non-ticketed visitors to pass through security at 13 U.S. airports, according to a report from Newsweek.

    The program is at the proposed rule stage, as reported by Newsweek. The TSA has not yet determined the cause of any incident, as none has been reported.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 16 Sept 2026, 10:53current

    First published.

  2. Version 16 Sept 2026, 10:46current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.