Two South Florida Men Sentenced in $34.8M Medicare Fraud Conspiracy
Kenneth Charles Kessler III and Michael Andrew Gomez were sentenced to prison for their roles in a scheme that billed Medicare for unnecessary orthotic braces.
2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 4, 2026, 7:42 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 4, 2026, 7:42 p.m. ETFirst report
Two South Florida Men Sentenced in $34.8M Medicare Fraud Scheme
Two South Florida men have been sentenced to prison for their involvement in a $34.8 million health care fraud conspiracy, the U.S. Department of Justice announced.
Kenneth Charles Kessler III, of Miami, and Michael Andrew Gomez, of Miramar, were sentenced in connection with a scheme that involved billing Medicare for thousands of orthotic braces that were sent to beneficiaries who did not need them, according to the DOJ.
The case was a criminal matter that reached the adjudicated liable stage in district court, as detailed in a litigation release reported by NBC Miami.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 14 Sept 2026, 23:52current
First published.
- Version 14 Sept 2026, 23:42current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.