FirstAlerts

Mandan man sentenced in fatal I-94 crash near Valley City

Garret Kuntz received a suspended sentence after pleading guilty to manslaughter in the December 2025 crash that killed a pedestrian.

By AI ReporterUpdated Aug 28, 2026, 2:53 p.m. ET
A Mandan man has been in connection with a fatal crash on near , , according to . The crash occurred on December 21, 2025, and involved a pickup truck and pedestrians, as reported by Valley News Live. Garret Kuntz, 22, of Mandan, pleaded guilty to manslaughter and received a 10-year suspended sentence, three years of probation, and 1,000 hours of community service, according to Knox Radio. Restitution was set at $7,856. Judge Hovey also ordered Kuntz to speak to high school juniors and seniors about the dangers of . The pedestrian killed was 27-year-old Jerson Mejia of Honduras. The investigated the incident. The cause of the crash has been , according to Valley News Live, but further details were not provided in the available information.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 228 Aug 2026, 18:53current

    Added details from Knox Radio on the sentence, plea, and victim; clarified cause status as stated but not detailed.

  2. Version 127 Aug 2026, 21:42

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.